Market Cap 10.28M
Revenue (ttm) 3.00M
Net Income (ttm) 39.79M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 0.00
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 1,326.33%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.00
Volume 14,100
Avg Vol 1,241,072
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 984,000.00
Stochastic %K 32%
Beta 0.90
Analysts Sell
Price Target $285.25

Company Profile

PAVmed Inc. engages in acquiring, developing, and commercializing novel products that target unmet needs in the United States. The company's lead products include CarpX, a patented, single-use, disposable, and minimally invasive surgical device for use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome; EsoCheck Esophageal Cell Collection Device, which consists of diagnostic test that serves as a testing tool for preventing esophageal adenocarcinoma deaths, through early detection of esophageal precance...

Industry: Medical Devices
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 917 813 1828
Address:
360 Madison Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, United States
BigJuicy
BigJuicy Mar. 20 at 2:45 PM
$PAVM unfortunately slow bleed out to $6.50 where the big investors are buying 1.5 million shares in their recent proxy vote. I will be buying at 6.5, patience until the.
1 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 20 at 8:58 AM
$LUCD & $PAVM @Tom__Brady Are you Walter Mitty? If we were to look at your timeline would we see you PUMPING and EXTOLLING the virtues of winners or LOSERS? What do you think? Everybody knows who I am. It is not a secret. You however are modelling yourself after a fictional character. So people can make of that what they may.
1 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 19 at 5:25 PM
$PAVM chatgpt is amazing. S-1 filing: likely ~1–3 weeks after March 27. Effective: ~3–4 weeks → early May 2026 (fast track). Sometimes companies: Pre-file or confidentially draft the S-1 before the vote. If that happened here (no evidence yet): 👉 Timeline could compress significantly
1 · Reply
xx007xx
xx007xx Mar. 19 at 5:01 PM
$LUCD $PAVM absolute 🤡 if you only knew…
0 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 19 at 4:05 PM
$PAVM it was originally because of the 31x leverage from lucd. At some point, there were 1M shares outstanding in pavm and they own 31M shares lucd. At that time, if lucd doubled, then pavm would benefit 61x on a per share basis. Also, the low float fostered more extreme price movements. But in a week, the dynamics will change when the 4.6M shares are released.
1 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 19 at 4:00 PM
$PAVM stike two. One at-bat left
0 · Reply
BigJuicy
BigJuicy Mar. 19 at 1:28 PM
$LUCD taking side bets on the price once LCD comes out. My guess is 2.50$. $PAVM 25$…. Who will be closest?
1 · Reply
Ironbow
Ironbow Mar. 19 at 1:16 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Dave switched accounts; dmc4321 and LaPlates are just spreading FUD; Fear uncertainty and doubt… classic tactic…. Ignore 👇🏻
2 · Reply
LPlates
LPlates Mar. 19 at 1:12 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Please explain why at the CAC meeting for EsoGuard all the participants used the BEST3 trial from Cyted Health as proof of "Real World Evidence" that a non invasive sampling device can be a valuable triage tool. Just search the transcript for BEST3. During the meeting, the panelists frequently used Cyted Health's BEST3 trial (the landmark randomized controlled trial for the Cytosponge-TFF3) as the primary benchmark for "clinical utility." So while you ATTEMPT to rubbish Cyted Healths diagnostics test it has been out longer and done more paid tests. That's just a FACT. So unless you consider yourself more of an expert than the specialists on the CAC call. (Did you turn down your invitation to speak 🤔?) Maybe you should accept you are DUMBER than a rock and stay quiet.
1 · Reply
xx007xx
xx007xx Mar. 19 at 12:13 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Cyted is ANOTHER SPONGE on a STRING. Medtronic showed that clinical viability is trash. Why on earth do you continue to peddle this trash on here? You should know better than that, yet here you are, as always. CYTED IS NOT THE SAME. CYTED IS a CYTOSPONGE EQUIVALENT. Your credibility with this is ZERO and viewed as the resident troll and that’s all. It doesn’t take a genius to see this so not sure why you spend day in and day out bashing it. Obviously you’re a scorned ex lover of their organization and want to try and pull it through the mud constantly. Pathetic. Truly sad.
1 · Reply
Latest News on PAVM
PAVmed Announces Reverse Stock Split

Dec 30, 2025, 9:01 AM EST - 2 months ago

PAVmed Announces Reverse Stock Split


BigJuicy
BigJuicy Mar. 20 at 2:45 PM
$PAVM unfortunately slow bleed out to $6.50 where the big investors are buying 1.5 million shares in their recent proxy vote. I will be buying at 6.5, patience until the.
1 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 20 at 8:58 AM
$LUCD & $PAVM @Tom__Brady Are you Walter Mitty? If we were to look at your timeline would we see you PUMPING and EXTOLLING the virtues of winners or LOSERS? What do you think? Everybody knows who I am. It is not a secret. You however are modelling yourself after a fictional character. So people can make of that what they may.
1 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 19 at 5:25 PM
$PAVM chatgpt is amazing. S-1 filing: likely ~1–3 weeks after March 27. Effective: ~3–4 weeks → early May 2026 (fast track). Sometimes companies: Pre-file or confidentially draft the S-1 before the vote. If that happened here (no evidence yet): 👉 Timeline could compress significantly
1 · Reply
xx007xx
xx007xx Mar. 19 at 5:01 PM
$LUCD $PAVM absolute 🤡 if you only knew…
0 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 19 at 4:05 PM
$PAVM it was originally because of the 31x leverage from lucd. At some point, there were 1M shares outstanding in pavm and they own 31M shares lucd. At that time, if lucd doubled, then pavm would benefit 61x on a per share basis. Also, the low float fostered more extreme price movements. But in a week, the dynamics will change when the 4.6M shares are released.
1 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 19 at 4:00 PM
$PAVM stike two. One at-bat left
0 · Reply
BigJuicy
BigJuicy Mar. 19 at 1:28 PM
$LUCD taking side bets on the price once LCD comes out. My guess is 2.50$. $PAVM 25$…. Who will be closest?
1 · Reply
Ironbow
Ironbow Mar. 19 at 1:16 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Dave switched accounts; dmc4321 and LaPlates are just spreading FUD; Fear uncertainty and doubt… classic tactic…. Ignore 👇🏻
2 · Reply
LPlates
LPlates Mar. 19 at 1:12 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Please explain why at the CAC meeting for EsoGuard all the participants used the BEST3 trial from Cyted Health as proof of "Real World Evidence" that a non invasive sampling device can be a valuable triage tool. Just search the transcript for BEST3. During the meeting, the panelists frequently used Cyted Health's BEST3 trial (the landmark randomized controlled trial for the Cytosponge-TFF3) as the primary benchmark for "clinical utility." So while you ATTEMPT to rubbish Cyted Healths diagnostics test it has been out longer and done more paid tests. That's just a FACT. So unless you consider yourself more of an expert than the specialists on the CAC call. (Did you turn down your invitation to speak 🤔?) Maybe you should accept you are DUMBER than a rock and stay quiet.
1 · Reply
xx007xx
xx007xx Mar. 19 at 12:13 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Cyted is ANOTHER SPONGE on a STRING. Medtronic showed that clinical viability is trash. Why on earth do you continue to peddle this trash on here? You should know better than that, yet here you are, as always. CYTED IS NOT THE SAME. CYTED IS a CYTOSPONGE EQUIVALENT. Your credibility with this is ZERO and viewed as the resident troll and that’s all. It doesn’t take a genius to see this so not sure why you spend day in and day out bashing it. Obviously you’re a scorned ex lover of their organization and want to try and pull it through the mud constantly. Pathetic. Truly sad.
1 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 19 at 6:25 AM
$LUCD & $PAVM This is just wrong. EsoCheck has got FDA approval and EsoGuard got a FDA Breakthrough Device Designation which has nothing to do with the 510 pathway. Cyted Health also has FDA approval since February 2024, and raised $44M in August 2025 to launch in the USA. It was Cyted Healths data from their UK clinical trial that was used as the basis for discussion at EsoGuards CAC meeting in September 2025 for "real world evidence" as EsoGuard did not have that evidence. There is also Previse which is now owned by Castle Biosciences which has a clear focus on esophageal cancers and has a large sales and marketing force already calling on the GI's etc as they SUCESSFULLY sell TissueCypher. So there is well funded EXISTING SUCESSFUL competitors in this niche. After approval you need to sell EsoGuard and the only concrete data we have is LUCD's 29 salespeople only managed to sell less than 2 covered tests a week in 1H 2025. That does not scale. AT ALL. MASSIVE DILUTION INCOMING1
1 · Reply
Investor_Scale
Investor_Scale Mar. 19 at 6:14 AM
$PAVM will this be the day ?!?
0 · Reply
oaksapollo
oaksapollo Mar. 18 at 8:12 PM
$PAVM congrats to PAVM on the green close, only green on my screen today. Hope it bodes well for the Moldx document drop tonight.
1 · Reply
Ironbow
Ironbow Mar. 18 at 5:54 PM
$LUCD $PAVM Dmc4321 aka Dave, just woke up from his patty’s day banger !! Ignore
1 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 18 at 5:12 PM
$LUCD & $PAVM this response reconsiles my Grok analysis with your Grok analysis. YOU WILL NOT LIKE IT!!! Revised timeline: Draft LCD most likely July–September 2026 (Q3) at the earliest, or potentially later / no draft in 2026 if evidence gaps persist. Consolidated Best Estimate (as of March 18, 2026)Taking both of my prior responses into account — the initial process-flow estimate (optimistic April–May draft tied to the June 9 open meeting) and the subsequent red-team critique (deeper dive into the actual CGS page language, housekeeping revisions, active LCD text, MolDX guidance, and peer-review realities) — here is the reconciled view: Revised timeline: Draft LCD most likely July–September 2026 (Q3) at the earliest, or potentially later / no draft in 2026 if evidence gaps persist. This is a meaningful shift from the original “April or May” prediction, but still within the broader 3–9 month post-CAC window I originally cited. THE LINK SO YOU CAN SEE THE FULL CHAT https://x.com/i/grok/share/0cd15e7cf5ad43dc8c3184593a6c256
2 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 18 at 4:43 PM
$LUCD & $PAVM @TheBearVsTheBull I decided to get Grok to comment on my Gemini based analysis. Grok surfaced something totally new to me. 4. Alignment with Evidence Requirements and the Cyted vs. EsoGuard RWE Tension Gemini correctly flags the peer-review issue, but the active LCD language is STRICTER than described. L39276/L39262 EXPLICITLY REQUIRES "clinical validity demonstrated in peer-reviewed literature (with biological/molecular basis for management change) plus successful Technical Assessment before any coverage can be proposed. Current tests (including EsoGuard) are stated as non-covered unless ALL CRITERIA —including peer-reviewed CV—are met. " cms.gov +1 The December 2025 EsoGuard 12,000-patient RWE was submitted after the CAC and explicitly noted in the transcript as "not yet in the peer-reviewed literature." med.noridianmedicare.com TO ACCESS THE CHAT https://x.com/i/grok/share/602bf80d672c48cc9a4bb29df28634a0
1 · Reply
BigJuicy
BigJuicy Mar. 18 at 4:33 AM
$LUCD Thursday yet? $PAVM
0 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 17 at 6:43 AM
$LUCD & $PAVM @RetiredMD A LIE This is just a MASS TESTING EVENT. It is announced today Tuesday, and ends tomorrow Wednesday. “Go get the early testing, go get ahead of it and live a long life,” Turner said. Free screenings are available for St. George firefighters through WEDNESDAY." Expect more of this crap as Lishan and Dennis try and create a narrative of progress to make up for THE TOTAL LACK OF PROGRESS.
1 · Reply
chuckjackson
chuckjackson Mar. 16 at 8:08 PM
$PAVM so is Lishan giving up control of pavm? Insiders hold 60+% (with Lishan having a large holding) of the 1.5M shares outstanding. Whoever owns the preferred shares will own 4.6M shares when converted which means they will then control pavm.
3 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 16 at 5:22 PM
$LUCD & $PAVM IT actually is NOT taking any longer than normal if you consider the FACTS and ignore the liars like @PortfolioMgmt23 1. RESUBMISSIONS both take longer as you need to get agreement with all parties that contributed to the original REJECTION that the quality of the information is sufficient to overturn that REJECTION. 2. They do NOT GET PRIORITY. Explicitly stated. And in a lot of cases are buried behind original submissions as the workload is less and a decision already exists. 3. During the CAC they discussed Cyted Healths real world PEER REVIEWED data as the Gold Standard, as EsoGuard does NOT HAVE EQUIVALENT data. EsoGuard is missing the most critical data as it has been submitted but has not been peer reviewed. Ask yourself this. Would CMS be embarassed and would peoples jobs be at risk if there was the EXACT data they need waiting for peer review but CMS jumped the gun and then the peer review process concluded that the data was NOT GOOD ENOUGH? JUST FACTS.
0 · Reply
Ironbow
Ironbow Mar. 16 at 12:22 PM
$LUCD $PAVM #Dave~#dmc4321 👇🏻🏆
0 · Reply
dmc4321
dmc4321 Mar. 16 at 5:27 AM
$LUCD & $PAVM Normally there would be a Press Release late this week to try and create a narrative of "Progress" before the Conference Call. Lishan and Dennis have pushed the CC back to Thursday from the usual Wednesday in the hope that draft approval will be announced, it wont BTW. I suggest you ask this series of questions as at this stage they look at retail shareholders as total cuckolds. 1. You said you would focus on testing patients that would be covered under the population at risk when Esoguard gets approved. You did 500 a qtr in Q1 & Q2 of 2025. How many did you do in Q3 and Q 4 of 2025? The vast majority of your tests were done in mass testing events (3 nurses 200 people tested) how many additional nurses and sales people do you need to hire immediately if you are only testing 10 patients per location as flights, hotels etc remain the same. Is it 50 nurses per 200 tests? What is the largest number of patients tested that paid the full rate $1983 in one day at one location?
0 · Reply