Market Cap 310.74M
Revenue (ttm) 56.29M
Net Income (ttm) 40.90M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio 2.44
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 72.66%
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.25
Volume 1,624,100
Avg Vol 572,332
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 15.29M
Stochastic %K 29%
Beta 1.32
Analysts Strong Sell
Price Target $65.67

Company Profile

Semler Scientific, Inc. provides technology solutions to enhance the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare providers in the United States. The company's products include QuantaFlo, a four-minute in-office blood flow test that enables healthcare providers to use blood flow measurements as part of their examinations of a patient's vascular condition. The company's products serve cardiologists, internists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, podiatrists, family practitioners, healthcare...

Industry: Medical Devices
Sector: Healthcare
Phone: 877 774 4211
Address:
2340-2348 Walsh Avenue, Suite 2344, Santa Clara, United States
tasener
tasener Feb. 3 at 6:11 PM
$ASST $BTC.X $MSTR $SMLR To clarify (since there’s lots of unqualified noise): reverse splits are NOT an “endless reset button” anymore — Nasdaq moved specifically to stop the repeat reverse-split → regain compliance → repeat cycle. How it used to work (in practice): • stock drifts below $1 • company does a reverse split • regains compliance • repeats the cycle What’s different now (Nasdaq): 1) One reverse split = major limitation If a Nasdaq-listed company has done a reverse split in the prior 12 months and then falls below the $1.00 minimum bid again, it may be ineligible for a cure period and Nasdaq can issue a delisting determination instead of giving more time. 2) Multiple reverse splits = immediate trouble If a company has done one or more reverse splits in the last 2 years with a cumulative ratio of 250:1 or more, Nasdaq can issue a delisting determination with no cure period. 3) Ultra-low price hard stop If a stock closes at $0.10 or below for 10 consecutive trading days, Nasdaq can move straight to delisting — no cure period (appeal process aside). 4) A reverse split ≠ automatic compliance Even after a reverse split, the stock still needs to hold $1.00+ for 10 consecutive trading days (Nasdaq can require longer) to regain compliance, and if the split triggers another listing deficiency, you’re not “cured” until both issues are fixed. That’s why “they can just reverse split again and again” is outdated.
1 · Reply
Anonymouspapertrader
Anonymouspapertrader Feb. 3 at 5:53 PM
$ASST $BTC.X $MSTR $SMLR One mistake in your thesis, Rever Splits are in fact endless (to a point) You get 250:1 per year, nobody said you have to wait to fall out of compliance in order to enact a reverse split. If you did them to a tune of 7:1 each time the stock hit 1.50 you could easily stay afloat until you get a reset in the allotted amount. That is all.
0 · Reply
tasener
tasener Feb. 3 at 5:50 PM
$ASST $BTC.X $MSTR $SMLR Genuine question for the community — what am I missing here? There’s a lot of noise and I’m trying to separate facts from hype. $ASST is trading around $0.68, yet Nasdaq requires a minimum $1.00 bid price to remain compliant. This isn’t new — there have been multiple efforts in the past to keep the bid above $1.00 to avoid (or resolve) deficiency risk. A reverse split tied to $SMLR Shouldn’t change the underlying issue for ASST itself. Compliance is issuer-specific — it can’t be “fixed” by another ticker’s corporate action. Under Nasdaq rules, once a company is deemed deficient, it generally needs to trade at or above $1.00 for 10 consecutive trading days to regain compliance. And reverse splits are now more restricted, so they’re not an endless reset button. So my question is simple: what’s the bullish case for staying sub-$1.X in the near term? If delisting risk is real (or the market thinks it is), then getting back above $1.00 sooner rather than later seems important. Personally, I’m watching the broader crypto/Bitcoin narrative — if $ASST is positioning itself as aligned to $BTC.X (and by extension the $MSTR trade), then the setup looks compelling to me — but I want to understand what others think I’m overlooking. Not bearish — just trying to understand the mechanics. Curious to hear thoughts.
5 · Reply
RonJohn1337
RonJohn1337 Jan. 29 at 6:53 PM
$ASST being tied only to $BTC.X was great for $SMLR holders 🤣
0 · Reply
MMix0117
MMix0117 Jan. 28 at 2:13 PM
$ASST they bought the dip. AGAIN! 333.9 more $BTC.X No $SMLR debt by April. LFGGGGGGGG!
0 · Reply
TrentEB
TrentEB Jan. 23 at 10:06 PM
$SMLR merger done. Just delete this stock off your Stocktwits list and still on asst
0 · Reply
WallsteetsBearishJeet
WallsteetsBearishJeet Jan. 23 at 3:29 PM
$SMLR what happened to this stock?
2 · Reply
ZipcodeChangingWealth
ZipcodeChangingWealth Jan. 23 at 1:27 AM
$MSTR Look at $OSTK, $MSTR, $SMLR, and $TSLA: all were legacy companies shorted to oblivion that pivoted into high-growth tech or digital assets. In every case, they hit a 7-10 day "quiet period" where volume died and the stock was walked down because insiders were legally barred from taking action while finalizing major deals. We’re seeing that exact pattern now: a "gagged" $YYAI Chairman who just committed millions at a 20% premium ($1.37) while waiting for the $500M JV to officially drop and trap the shorts. It's just patterns. Look at whats happening, look at the objective, look at other companies that have done this in the past, find the patterns which match. This is a well trodden path before positive catalysts. The quiet period begins 1 minute after the last announcement most likely. Before any big press releases or filings.
0 · Reply
ZipcodeChangingWealth
ZipcodeChangingWealth Jan. 22 at 8:13 PM
Look at $OSTK, $MSTR, $SMLR, and $TSLA: all were legacy companies shorted to oblivion that pivoted into high-growth tech or digital assets. In every case, they hit a 7-10 day "quiet period" where volume died and the stock was walked down because insiders were legally barred from taking action while finalizing major deals. We’re seeing that exact pattern now: a "gagged" $YYAI Chairman who just committed millions at a 20% premium ($1.37) while waiting for the $500M JV to officially drop and trap the shorts. It's just patterns. Look at whats happening, look at the objective, look at other companies that have done this in the past, find the patterns which match. This is a well trodden path before positive catalysts. The quiet period begins 1 minute after the last announcement most likely. In any case, he needs to report the 4.2M shares Thursday or Friday depends when it settled. And I also assume that might be the time it launches.
1 · Reply
ZipcodeChangingWealth
ZipcodeChangingWealth Jan. 22 at 1:32 PM
$YYAI We’re seeing that exact pattern now of : a "gagged" Chairman who just committed millions at a 20% premium ($1.37) while waiting for the $500M JV to officially drop and trap the shorts. Look at $OSTK, $MSTR, $SMLR, and $TSLA: all were legacy companies shorted to oblivion that pivoted into high-growth tech or digital assets. In every case, they hit a 7-10 day "quiet period" where volume died and the stock was walked down because insiders were legally barred from taking action while finalizing major deals.
1 · Reply
Latest News on SMLR
Crypto's Hottest Trade Crumples

Dec 9, 2025, 4:18 PM EST - 2 months ago

Crypto's Hottest Trade Crumples

ASST MSTR SBET


Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Aug 4, 2025, 8:22 PM EDT - 6 months ago

Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript


Semler Scientific wants to hold 105,000 Bitcoin by 2027

Jun 20, 2025, 5:53 AM EDT - 8 months ago

Semler Scientific wants to hold 105,000 Bitcoin by 2027


tasener
tasener Feb. 3 at 6:11 PM
$ASST $BTC.X $MSTR $SMLR To clarify (since there’s lots of unqualified noise): reverse splits are NOT an “endless reset button” anymore — Nasdaq moved specifically to stop the repeat reverse-split → regain compliance → repeat cycle. How it used to work (in practice): • stock drifts below $1 • company does a reverse split • regains compliance • repeats the cycle What’s different now (Nasdaq): 1) One reverse split = major limitation If a Nasdaq-listed company has done a reverse split in the prior 12 months and then falls below the $1.00 minimum bid again, it may be ineligible for a cure period and Nasdaq can issue a delisting determination instead of giving more time. 2) Multiple reverse splits = immediate trouble If a company has done one or more reverse splits in the last 2 years with a cumulative ratio of 250:1 or more, Nasdaq can issue a delisting determination with no cure period. 3) Ultra-low price hard stop If a stock closes at $0.10 or below for 10 consecutive trading days, Nasdaq can move straight to delisting — no cure period (appeal process aside). 4) A reverse split ≠ automatic compliance Even after a reverse split, the stock still needs to hold $1.00+ for 10 consecutive trading days (Nasdaq can require longer) to regain compliance, and if the split triggers another listing deficiency, you’re not “cured” until both issues are fixed. That’s why “they can just reverse split again and again” is outdated.
1 · Reply
Anonymouspapertrader
Anonymouspapertrader Feb. 3 at 5:53 PM
$ASST $BTC.X $MSTR $SMLR One mistake in your thesis, Rever Splits are in fact endless (to a point) You get 250:1 per year, nobody said you have to wait to fall out of compliance in order to enact a reverse split. If you did them to a tune of 7:1 each time the stock hit 1.50 you could easily stay afloat until you get a reset in the allotted amount. That is all.
0 · Reply
tasener
tasener Feb. 3 at 5:50 PM
$ASST $BTC.X $MSTR $SMLR Genuine question for the community — what am I missing here? There’s a lot of noise and I’m trying to separate facts from hype. $ASST is trading around $0.68, yet Nasdaq requires a minimum $1.00 bid price to remain compliant. This isn’t new — there have been multiple efforts in the past to keep the bid above $1.00 to avoid (or resolve) deficiency risk. A reverse split tied to $SMLR Shouldn’t change the underlying issue for ASST itself. Compliance is issuer-specific — it can’t be “fixed” by another ticker’s corporate action. Under Nasdaq rules, once a company is deemed deficient, it generally needs to trade at or above $1.00 for 10 consecutive trading days to regain compliance. And reverse splits are now more restricted, so they’re not an endless reset button. So my question is simple: what’s the bullish case for staying sub-$1.X in the near term? If delisting risk is real (or the market thinks it is), then getting back above $1.00 sooner rather than later seems important. Personally, I’m watching the broader crypto/Bitcoin narrative — if $ASST is positioning itself as aligned to $BTC.X (and by extension the $MSTR trade), then the setup looks compelling to me — but I want to understand what others think I’m overlooking. Not bearish — just trying to understand the mechanics. Curious to hear thoughts.
5 · Reply
RonJohn1337
RonJohn1337 Jan. 29 at 6:53 PM
$ASST being tied only to $BTC.X was great for $SMLR holders 🤣
0 · Reply
MMix0117
MMix0117 Jan. 28 at 2:13 PM
$ASST they bought the dip. AGAIN! 333.9 more $BTC.X No $SMLR debt by April. LFGGGGGGGG!
0 · Reply
TrentEB
TrentEB Jan. 23 at 10:06 PM
$SMLR merger done. Just delete this stock off your Stocktwits list and still on asst
0 · Reply
WallsteetsBearishJeet
WallsteetsBearishJeet Jan. 23 at 3:29 PM
$SMLR what happened to this stock?
2 · Reply
ZipcodeChangingWealth
ZipcodeChangingWealth Jan. 23 at 1:27 AM
$MSTR Look at $OSTK, $MSTR, $SMLR, and $TSLA: all were legacy companies shorted to oblivion that pivoted into high-growth tech or digital assets. In every case, they hit a 7-10 day "quiet period" where volume died and the stock was walked down because insiders were legally barred from taking action while finalizing major deals. We’re seeing that exact pattern now: a "gagged" $YYAI Chairman who just committed millions at a 20% premium ($1.37) while waiting for the $500M JV to officially drop and trap the shorts. It's just patterns. Look at whats happening, look at the objective, look at other companies that have done this in the past, find the patterns which match. This is a well trodden path before positive catalysts. The quiet period begins 1 minute after the last announcement most likely. Before any big press releases or filings.
0 · Reply
ZipcodeChangingWealth
ZipcodeChangingWealth Jan. 22 at 8:13 PM
Look at $OSTK, $MSTR, $SMLR, and $TSLA: all were legacy companies shorted to oblivion that pivoted into high-growth tech or digital assets. In every case, they hit a 7-10 day "quiet period" where volume died and the stock was walked down because insiders were legally barred from taking action while finalizing major deals. We’re seeing that exact pattern now: a "gagged" $YYAI Chairman who just committed millions at a 20% premium ($1.37) while waiting for the $500M JV to officially drop and trap the shorts. It's just patterns. Look at whats happening, look at the objective, look at other companies that have done this in the past, find the patterns which match. This is a well trodden path before positive catalysts. The quiet period begins 1 minute after the last announcement most likely. In any case, he needs to report the 4.2M shares Thursday or Friday depends when it settled. And I also assume that might be the time it launches.
1 · Reply
ZipcodeChangingWealth
ZipcodeChangingWealth Jan. 22 at 1:32 PM
$YYAI We’re seeing that exact pattern now of : a "gagged" Chairman who just committed millions at a 20% premium ($1.37) while waiting for the $500M JV to officially drop and trap the shorts. Look at $OSTK, $MSTR, $SMLR, and $TSLA: all were legacy companies shorted to oblivion that pivoted into high-growth tech or digital assets. In every case, they hit a 7-10 day "quiet period" where volume died and the stock was walked down because insiders were legally barred from taking action while finalizing major deals.
1 · Reply
Sundancer
Sundancer Jan. 22 at 11:38 AM
$ASST $SATA $SMLR Great analysis.
2 · Reply
JoeCoolTrader
JoeCoolTrader Jan. 22 at 4:16 AM
$SATA $SMLR @MMix0117 - Let's run the math. Year 1 $ASST sells 150M of SATA for 135M Gives out 12% interest or 18M in one year So, Strive really received 117M, but on the hook now for 150M Strive uses 13M for operational cost 117M - 13M =104M left 10% of SATA cashes out at the end of the year = 91M left, but still on the hook for 135M. Buys Bitcoin with the 91M left over. Year 2 Strive sells another 150M of SATA for 135M Same 12%, same operational cost 135 - 18 -13 = 104 But now 10% of year 1 and 10% year 2 cashes out at EOY 13.5 + 15 = 28.5M 104 - 28.5 = 75.5M left over, but still on the hook for 256.5M Year 3 150M SATA for 135M 135 - 18 - 13 = 104 104 - 12 - 13.5 - 15 = 63.5M left over, but still on the hook for 360M Eventually, Strive will be paying out the total amount received in interest and closeout. And then, Strive will have to increase the amount of SATA sold just to meet the interest payments, or sell more ASST shares to raise cash, diluting current shareholders.
4 · Reply
stonks508
stonks508 Jan. 22 at 3:18 AM
$ASST Increasing the $SATA offering by $150 M. Proceeds will be used to close out $SMLR debt and buy bitcoin.
0 · Reply
I_HODL_GOLD
I_HODL_GOLD Jan. 21 at 1:13 PM
0 · Reply
vdm_reborn
vdm_reborn Jan. 20 at 8:27 PM
$ASST $SMLR da fuck ???
0 · Reply
deffn
deffn Jan. 20 at 8:01 PM
$ASST will we be listed on more Exchanges after the merger like $SMLR was before? Might help to get this misery back up.
1 · Reply
RonJohn1337
RonJohn1337 Jan. 20 at 2:49 PM
$ASST the merger of the $SMLR and $ASST shares. They had to halt in order to calculate the shares as the merger gave SMLR holders 21.05 $ASST shares
1 · Reply
RonJohn1337
RonJohn1337 Jan. 20 at 1:51 PM
$ASST $SMLR share had to be merged into $ASST shares 🤷‍♂️
0 · Reply
Tradingistheway
Tradingistheway Jan. 17 at 9:55 PM
$ASST $SMLR both 0?????
0 · Reply
I_Need_A_Winner
I_Need_A_Winner Jan. 17 at 12:57 PM
0 · Reply
I_Need_A_Winner
I_Need_A_Winner Jan. 17 at 12:56 PM
$SMLR One thing is clear to me….every smlr and asst holder needs to do their parts in making sure Vivek Scamaswamy never steps foot in the Ohio Governors mansion no matter what your politics are. whatever that may look like. let him enjoy his riches, but Ohioans, dont reward his twisted ambitions and hunger for irrelevant power
0 · Reply
SuperGreenToday
SuperGreenToday Jan. 17 at 12:00 AM
0 · Reply