Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 53,400
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

The fund’s strategy involves constructing a short portfolio of U.S.-listed equity securities or derivatives that provide short exposure to those underlying securities and generating income through an options portfolio, which involve using options contracts on underlying securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 19 at 1:13 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Weekly Pairing Strength (–1.43%) When market activity weekly ETF pricing is accurate, dividend payouts should also reflect those same market activity inversions weekly also. Agreed? THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4101) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.1620 / WNTR 0.3892 — 0.5512 (+3.14%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2244 / ULTY 0.3197 — 0.5441 (0.00%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2246 / FIAT 0.3100 — 0.5346 (+0.11%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2265 / TSLY 0.2025 — 0.4290 (–13.41%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2312 / NVDY 0.1200 — 0.3512 (+4.17%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4450) 1️⃣ SLTY 0.2262 / ULTY 0.3179 — 0.5441 2️⃣ MSTY 0.1809 / WNTR 0.3535 — 0.5344 3️⃣ CONY 0.2283 / FIAT 0.3057 — 0.5340 4️⃣ CRSH 0.3166 / TSLY 0.1788 — 0.4954 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2383 / NVDY 0.0988 — 0.3371 Notes: System dipped –1.43% overall. MSTY/WNTR reclaimed the top spot with solid improvement. SLTY/ULTY held flat, showing stability. CONY/FIAT nudged higher. CRSH/TSLY saw the largest decline. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 17 at 3:13 PM
$CRSH Monday Overview "Inverted Pairing System" — MSTY Shows the System Works Solid start to the week in the IRA. MSTY was already at the top of the ladder during Friday’s reinforcement, and today’s move simply strengthened that position. Its 1‑year daily chart showed full technical compression — MACD flattening, W%R deep oversold, and price sitting on the lower envelope with no downward runway left. That’s exactly why it was the correct reinforcement target: the chart structure made downward continuation unlikely. Friday’s buy boosted share count and dividend mass, and today the market confirmed the read. With contributions, dividends, and spare‑change rewards flowing in this week, Friday morning will decide the next baseline using technical chart data & ladder percentage. Until then, it’s just birdwatching. “The weakest branch grows strongest when the wind finally shifts.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 14 at 2:33 PM
$CRSH Weekly Inverted Pairing System Reinforcement today. Picked up MSTY shares this morning — baseline low percentage ETF for this week, so the system rotated exactly as designed. Cost basis lowered and the share count increased, reinforcing forward dividend flow permanently. 1‑Year Daily Chart Notes: MSTY continues to sit at the extreme lower band, with price closing at 11.89, right on the lower Bollinger band. MACD histogram has turned positive even with the MACD line still below signal, showing early momentum shift. Williams %R is pinned at ‑99.65, confirming deep-cycle oversold territory. KST remains negative but is curling upward from the trough. Money Flow at 30 shows accumulation beginning at the bottom of the range. This is classic system‑level positioning: technical exhaustion + cycle alignment. Weekly rotation complete, ROE gates satisfied, and dividends will pay forward forever. I take what I get and let the system do its work. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 12 at 1:25 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System – Week 33 — Weekly Pairing Strength (−14.20%) YieldMax, terrible...what happened? THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4450) 1️⃣ SLTY 0.2262 / ULTY 0.3179 — 0.5441 (−3.32%) 2️⃣ MSTY 0.1809 / WNTR 0.3535 — 0.5344 (−20.18%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2283 / FIAT 0.3057 — 0.5340 (−12.88%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.3166 / TSLY 0.1788 — 0.4954 (−20.10%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2383 / NVDY 0.0988 — 0.3371 (−12.29%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.8496) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2083 / WNTR 0.4613 — 0.6696 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2545 / ULTY 0.3082 — 0.5627 3️⃣ CONY 0.2571 / FIAT 0.3558 — 0.6129 4️⃣ CRSH 0.3905 / TSLY 0.2296 — 0.6201 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2877 / NVDY 0.0966 — 0.3843 Notable shifts: System dropped −14.20% overall. SLTY/ULTY held strongest at −3.32%, showing stability. MSTY/WNTR fell −20.18%, steepest decline. CONY/FIAT weakened −12.88%. CRSH/TSLY slid −20.10%, matching MSTY/WNTR’s downside. DIPS/NVDY decreased −12.29%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 10 at 4:02 PM
$CRSH The Inverted Pairing System Dynamics I'm running my Inverted Pairing System like a 401k on steroids. Traditional 401k plans use a mix of equities and bonds, and many equity funds quietly blend in bond exposure anyway — just not the options‑driven income strategies we’re using here. My system replaces those conventional components with bond‑and‑options‑based ETFs that generate weekly dividends, effectively acting as the employer match. The rules force disciplined accumulation by buying whichever position sits at the lowest percentage each Friday. The system operates across four long/short pairings now: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. As prices shift, the weakest ETF becomes the weekly reinforcement point, lowering cost basis, increasing share count, and accelerating long‑term dividend throughput. Throughout each week, I just monitor "birdwatch" market behavior. What's a 401k to do? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 7 at 2:15 PM
$CRSH My weekly baseline low percentage reinforcement purchase today was in TSLY — added to the position at the open this morning. Price action on the advanced chart continues to respect the lower Bollinger band and the MA‑50 envelope, with momentum indicators (MACD, RSI, KST, %R) all sitting in deep‑oversold territory. That’s exactly where this ETF historically begins its next compression‑to‑expansion cycle. Trading Central’s technical sentiment is showing strong short‑term strength (2–6 weeks) even while mid‑term remains weak and long‑term neutral. That short‑term bar is the only one that matters for cycle‑based rotation — it aligns perfectly with the current compression zone on the chart. This was another simple elemental reinforcement intended to continue my overall account balance growth while adhering to the mechanical symmetry of my Inverted Pairings System. You can't fight fate...LOL! $CRSH, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 5:29 PM
$CRSH Effective today, I’ve removed DIPS and NVDY from my Inverted Pairings System and rebalanced my entire account. I now run four pairings: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. Cutting from 10 ETFs to 8 is a permanent ROE upgrade that boosts system efficiency and balance‑growth output by ~22–30%. I’ll still monitor DIPS and NVDY (as I do YQQQ and QDTY), but their weakened pairing strength and reduced YieldMax payouts slowed my balance‑growth rate and no longer meet system requirements. My ROE has been updated to reflect the four‑pair structure because these pairings deliver stronger balance‑growth potential based on the math. Still, the baseline low percentage ETF gets reinforced. Efficiency rises when the weakest variables are removed from the equation. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 2:58 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System – Week 32 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+1.86%) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.8496) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2083 / WNTR 0.4613 — 0.6696 (‑3.50%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3905 / TSLY 0.2296 — 0.6201 (+8.20%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2571 / FIAT 0.3558 — 0.6129 (+9.61%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2545 / ULTY 0.3082 — 0.5627 (+2.91%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2887 / NVDY 0.0966 — 0.3843 (‑9.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing Strength rose +1.86%. MSTY/WNTR dipped ‑3.50% but remains structurally stable. CRSH/TSLY added +8.20%, strong upward momentum. CONY/FIAT strengthened +9.61%, driven by FIAT’s surge. SLTY/ULTY improved +2.91%, a modest but positive move. DIPS/NVDY weakened ‑9.48%, with both sides lower. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 31 at 2:03 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Week 31 Baseline Low Percentage ETF Buy - ULTY Week 31’s baseline lowest‑percentage buy went to ULTY, and the 1‑Yr/Daily chart confirms the call. Price has tightened into a volatility coil, Bollinger Bands have narrowed, and downside momentum is fading. MACD’s negative drift is flattening, %R sits in the lower band where ULTY often begins mid‑channel recovery, and Money Flow has stabilized instead of bleeding lower. KST is curling upward, signaling early‑cycle shift. This is classic controlled weakness inside the Inverted Pairings System — exactly when the baseline ETF is supposed to be accumulated. “Weakness bought at the right moment becomes tomorrow’s strength.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 7:08 PM
$CRSH “I run an Inverted Pairings System built around five ETF pairs: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY, MSTY/WNTR. Declining valuations don’t hurt my strategy—they strengthen it. When an ETF drops, it eventually becomes the baseline low‑percentage position, and that’s where I accumulate the most shares possible at the lowest point in its technical cycle. More shares = more weekly dividends = more compounding. Reverse splits aren’t a problem either. They reset pricing, tighten symmetry, and immediately boost weekly pairing strength. That’s why I track pairings every week—the weakest pairing often signals the next structural shift. While others panic‑sell, I recycle dividends and reinforce the baseline ETF. One rises, a new baseline emerges, and the machine keeps compounding. As always: the system is the system.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 19 at 1:13 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Weekly Pairing Strength (–1.43%) When market activity weekly ETF pricing is accurate, dividend payouts should also reflect those same market activity inversions weekly also. Agreed? THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4101) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.1620 / WNTR 0.3892 — 0.5512 (+3.14%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2244 / ULTY 0.3197 — 0.5441 (0.00%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2246 / FIAT 0.3100 — 0.5346 (+0.11%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2265 / TSLY 0.2025 — 0.4290 (–13.41%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2312 / NVDY 0.1200 — 0.3512 (+4.17%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4450) 1️⃣ SLTY 0.2262 / ULTY 0.3179 — 0.5441 2️⃣ MSTY 0.1809 / WNTR 0.3535 — 0.5344 3️⃣ CONY 0.2283 / FIAT 0.3057 — 0.5340 4️⃣ CRSH 0.3166 / TSLY 0.1788 — 0.4954 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2383 / NVDY 0.0988 — 0.3371 Notes: System dipped –1.43% overall. MSTY/WNTR reclaimed the top spot with solid improvement. SLTY/ULTY held flat, showing stability. CONY/FIAT nudged higher. CRSH/TSLY saw the largest decline. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 17 at 3:13 PM
$CRSH Monday Overview "Inverted Pairing System" — MSTY Shows the System Works Solid start to the week in the IRA. MSTY was already at the top of the ladder during Friday’s reinforcement, and today’s move simply strengthened that position. Its 1‑year daily chart showed full technical compression — MACD flattening, W%R deep oversold, and price sitting on the lower envelope with no downward runway left. That’s exactly why it was the correct reinforcement target: the chart structure made downward continuation unlikely. Friday’s buy boosted share count and dividend mass, and today the market confirmed the read. With contributions, dividends, and spare‑change rewards flowing in this week, Friday morning will decide the next baseline using technical chart data & ladder percentage. Until then, it’s just birdwatching. “The weakest branch grows strongest when the wind finally shifts.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 14 at 2:33 PM
$CRSH Weekly Inverted Pairing System Reinforcement today. Picked up MSTY shares this morning — baseline low percentage ETF for this week, so the system rotated exactly as designed. Cost basis lowered and the share count increased, reinforcing forward dividend flow permanently. 1‑Year Daily Chart Notes: MSTY continues to sit at the extreme lower band, with price closing at 11.89, right on the lower Bollinger band. MACD histogram has turned positive even with the MACD line still below signal, showing early momentum shift. Williams %R is pinned at ‑99.65, confirming deep-cycle oversold territory. KST remains negative but is curling upward from the trough. Money Flow at 30 shows accumulation beginning at the bottom of the range. This is classic system‑level positioning: technical exhaustion + cycle alignment. Weekly rotation complete, ROE gates satisfied, and dividends will pay forward forever. I take what I get and let the system do its work. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 12 at 1:25 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System – Week 33 — Weekly Pairing Strength (−14.20%) YieldMax, terrible...what happened? THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4450) 1️⃣ SLTY 0.2262 / ULTY 0.3179 — 0.5441 (−3.32%) 2️⃣ MSTY 0.1809 / WNTR 0.3535 — 0.5344 (−20.18%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2283 / FIAT 0.3057 — 0.5340 (−12.88%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.3166 / TSLY 0.1788 — 0.4954 (−20.10%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2383 / NVDY 0.0988 — 0.3371 (−12.29%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.8496) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2083 / WNTR 0.4613 — 0.6696 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2545 / ULTY 0.3082 — 0.5627 3️⃣ CONY 0.2571 / FIAT 0.3558 — 0.6129 4️⃣ CRSH 0.3905 / TSLY 0.2296 — 0.6201 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2877 / NVDY 0.0966 — 0.3843 Notable shifts: System dropped −14.20% overall. SLTY/ULTY held strongest at −3.32%, showing stability. MSTY/WNTR fell −20.18%, steepest decline. CONY/FIAT weakened −12.88%. CRSH/TSLY slid −20.10%, matching MSTY/WNTR’s downside. DIPS/NVDY decreased −12.29%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 10 at 4:02 PM
$CRSH The Inverted Pairing System Dynamics I'm running my Inverted Pairing System like a 401k on steroids. Traditional 401k plans use a mix of equities and bonds, and many equity funds quietly blend in bond exposure anyway — just not the options‑driven income strategies we’re using here. My system replaces those conventional components with bond‑and‑options‑based ETFs that generate weekly dividends, effectively acting as the employer match. The rules force disciplined accumulation by buying whichever position sits at the lowest percentage each Friday. The system operates across four long/short pairings now: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. As prices shift, the weakest ETF becomes the weekly reinforcement point, lowering cost basis, increasing share count, and accelerating long‑term dividend throughput. Throughout each week, I just monitor "birdwatch" market behavior. What's a 401k to do? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 7 at 2:15 PM
$CRSH My weekly baseline low percentage reinforcement purchase today was in TSLY — added to the position at the open this morning. Price action on the advanced chart continues to respect the lower Bollinger band and the MA‑50 envelope, with momentum indicators (MACD, RSI, KST, %R) all sitting in deep‑oversold territory. That’s exactly where this ETF historically begins its next compression‑to‑expansion cycle. Trading Central’s technical sentiment is showing strong short‑term strength (2–6 weeks) even while mid‑term remains weak and long‑term neutral. That short‑term bar is the only one that matters for cycle‑based rotation — it aligns perfectly with the current compression zone on the chart. This was another simple elemental reinforcement intended to continue my overall account balance growth while adhering to the mechanical symmetry of my Inverted Pairings System. You can't fight fate...LOL! $CRSH, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 5:29 PM
$CRSH Effective today, I’ve removed DIPS and NVDY from my Inverted Pairings System and rebalanced my entire account. I now run four pairings: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, CRSH/TSLY, and MSTY/WNTR. Cutting from 10 ETFs to 8 is a permanent ROE upgrade that boosts system efficiency and balance‑growth output by ~22–30%. I’ll still monitor DIPS and NVDY (as I do YQQQ and QDTY), but their weakened pairing strength and reduced YieldMax payouts slowed my balance‑growth rate and no longer meet system requirements. My ROE has been updated to reflect the four‑pair structure because these pairings deliver stronger balance‑growth potential based on the math. Still, the baseline low percentage ETF gets reinforced. Efficiency rises when the weakest variables are removed from the equation. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Aug. 5 at 2:58 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System – Week 32 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+1.86%) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.8496) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2083 / WNTR 0.4613 — 0.6696 (‑3.50%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3905 / TSLY 0.2296 — 0.6201 (+8.20%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2571 / FIAT 0.3558 — 0.6129 (+9.61%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2545 / ULTY 0.3082 — 0.5627 (+2.91%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2887 / NVDY 0.0966 — 0.3843 (‑9.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing Strength rose +1.86%. MSTY/WNTR dipped ‑3.50% but remains structurally stable. CRSH/TSLY added +8.20%, strong upward momentum. CONY/FIAT strengthened +9.61%, driven by FIAT’s surge. SLTY/ULTY improved +2.91%, a modest but positive move. DIPS/NVDY weakened ‑9.48%, with both sides lower. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 31 at 2:03 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System Week 31 Baseline Low Percentage ETF Buy - ULTY Week 31’s baseline lowest‑percentage buy went to ULTY, and the 1‑Yr/Daily chart confirms the call. Price has tightened into a volatility coil, Bollinger Bands have narrowed, and downside momentum is fading. MACD’s negative drift is flattening, %R sits in the lower band where ULTY often begins mid‑channel recovery, and Money Flow has stabilized instead of bleeding lower. KST is curling upward, signaling early‑cycle shift. This is classic controlled weakness inside the Inverted Pairings System — exactly when the baseline ETF is supposed to be accumulated. “Weakness bought at the right moment becomes tomorrow’s strength.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 7:08 PM
$CRSH “I run an Inverted Pairings System built around five ETF pairs: SLTY/ULTY, CONY/FIAT, DIPS/NVDY, CRSH/TSLY, MSTY/WNTR. Declining valuations don’t hurt my strategy—they strengthen it. When an ETF drops, it eventually becomes the baseline low‑percentage position, and that’s where I accumulate the most shares possible at the lowest point in its technical cycle. More shares = more weekly dividends = more compounding. Reverse splits aren’t a problem either. They reset pricing, tighten symmetry, and immediately boost weekly pairing strength. That’s why I track pairings every week—the weakest pairing often signals the next structural shift. While others panic‑sell, I recycle dividends and reinforce the baseline ETF. One rises, a new baseline emerges, and the machine keeps compounding. As always: the system is the system.” $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 29 at 12:49 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System - Week 31 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+5.82%) Very stable once again! THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7976) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2222 / WNTR 0.4717 — 0.6939 (-3.94%) 2️⃣ CRSH 0.3584 / TSLY 0.2147 — 0.5731 (+31.34%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2942 / FIAT 0.2650 — 0.5592 (+1.16%) 4️⃣ SLTY 0.2372 / ULTY 0.3096 — 0.5468 (-1.42%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3059 / NVDY 0.1187 — 0.4246 (0.00%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.6439) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2231 / WNTR 0.4992 — 0.7223 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2371 / ULTY 0.3176 — 0.5547 3️⃣ CONY 0.2787 / FIAT 0.2741 — 0.5528 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1978 / TSLY 0.2385 — 0.4363 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2841 / NVDY 0.0937 — 0.4246 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing System dividend strength rose +5.82%. MSTY/WNTR fell -3.94% but remains the top pair. CRSH/TSLY exploded +31.34%, jumping from 4th to 2nd. CONY/FIAT added +1.16% and held mid-pack. SLTY/ULTY slipped -1.42%, dropping from 2nd to 4th. DIPS/NVDY was flat at 0.00%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 24 at 2:03 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Week 30 - Baseline Low Percentage ETF Purchase Update Today’s Lowest‑Percentage Baseline ETF buy went into CONY, completing this week’s reinforcement cycle. CONY was the lowest slot on the 10‑ETF ladder, triggering the mechanical baseline purchase today. Price is pressing the lower Bollinger Band (21.01 / 19.87 / 18.72), matching typical reset behavior inside the system. System Notes: CONY triggered the mechanical buy of shares as it reached the structural low of its current cycle. Momentum shows early stabilization: MACD (‑0.4724 / ‑0.6023 / 0.1299) is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, indicating initial momentum flattening. Williams %R at ‑84.18 remains deep in oversold territory, consistent with prior reset conditions. Money Flow (‑0.19) reflects long‑cycle exhaustion, and KST (‑63.27 / ‑97.10) is flattening, signaling deceleration rather than continuation. This was an easy selection! ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 22 at 1:10 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System - Week 30 — Weekly Pairing Strength (+6.94%) THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.6439) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2231/WNTR 0.4992 — 0.7223 (-4.94%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2371/ULTY 0.3176 — 0.5547 (-2.97%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2787/FIAT 0.2741 — 0.5528 (+9.62%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.1978/TSLY 0.2385 — 0.4363 (-6.29%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2841/NVDY 0.0937 — 0.3778 (+0.05%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4723) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2067/WNTR 0.5531 — 0.7598 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2415/ULTY 0.3302 — 0.5717 3️⃣ CONY 0.2430/FIAT 0.2613 — 0.5043 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2063/TSLY 0.2593 — 0.4656 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2813/NVDY 0.0963 — 0.3776 Notable shifts: Inverted Pairing System strength rose +6.94%. MSTY/WNTR fell -4.94% as WNTR dropped sharply. SLTY/ULTY slipped -2.97%. CONY/FIAT led the week with +9.62% strength. CRSH/TSLY weakened -6.29%. DIPS/NVDY was flat at +0.05%. $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 21 at 3:02 PM
$CRSH My investing system for high‑yield dividend ETFs is the Inverted Pairings System, built on five inverted pairings: CONY & FIAT, CRSH & TSLY, DIPS & NVDY, MSTY & WNTR, and SLTY & ULTY. These ten ETFs rotate across a 10‑rung ladder based on percentages. All dividends are consolidated, spare change is added, bi‑monthly contributions are included, and the total is used to buy shares of whatever ETF is the weekly baseline low ETF. Each week, that baseline ETF moves up the ladder, growing my account balance, while the inversions protect it. Weekly purchases increase dividends, which further expand the balance. My percentages continue to beat both the DOW and S&P 500. I win! As of today: My 30‑day my balance is +10.39% vs DOW ‑0.82% and S&P 500 ‑0.70%. My 3-month balance is +20.35% vs DOW +4.87% and S&P 500 +4.99%. My YTD balance is +49.26% vs DOW +9.90% and S&P 500 +9.43%. I win across the board! $CRSH, $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 17 at 2:06 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Rotation Update Today’s Lowest‑Percentage Baseline ETF buy went into TSLY @$25.53, completing this week’s reinforcement cycle. TSLY has now moved from the lowest slot of the 10‑ETF ladder up to the #3 slot on my ladder, maintaining alignment with the Inverted Pairings framework. Price remains near the lower Bollinger Band, matching typical reset behavior inside the system. System Notes: TSLY triggered the mechanical buy as it reached the structural low of its current cycle. Momentum shows early stabilization: MACD is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, indicating initial momentum flattening. Williams %R remains deep in oversold territory, consistent with prior reset conditions. Money Flow has steadied, and KST is flattening, signaling long‑cycle deceleration rather than continuation. This rotation reinforces the system by allocating into weakness — the core principle of the structure. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 15 at 12:19 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Pairing Strength THIS WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.4723) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2067/WNTR 0.5531 — 0.7598 (+9.95%) 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2415/ULTY 0.3302 — 0.5717 (-2.17%) 3️⃣ CONY 0.2430/FIAT 0.2613 — 0.5043 (-8.60%) 4️⃣ CRSH 0.2063/TSLY 0.2593 — 0.4656 (-4.00%) 5️⃣ DIPS 0.2813/NVDY 0.0963 — 0.3776 (-12.48%) LAST WEEK — Pair Strength (Total: 2.7435) 1️⃣ MSTY 0.2061/WNTR 0.4849 — 0.6910 2️⃣ SLTY 0.2460/ULTY 0.3384 — 0.5844 3️⃣ CONY 0.2794/FIAT 0.2723 — 0.5517 4️⃣ CRSH 0.20274/TSLY 0.2776 — 0.4850 5️⃣ DIPS 0.3343/NVDY 0.0971 — 0.4314 Notable shifts: System strength declined -9.88% this week. #1 MSTY/WNTR was the only strengthening pair, rising +9.95% as the system’s top anchor. #2 SLTY/ULTY slipped -2.17% but held the #2 rank. #3 CONY/FIAT continued its downward trend with an -8.60% drop. #4 CRSH/TSLY weakened -4.00%, mid‑tier. #5 DIPS/NVDY posted the largest decline at -12.48%. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
1 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 4:07 PM
$CRSH The corrections are simple actually for both ULTY & SLTY! From 2024–present, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. No other YieldMax pair shows this level of correlation. The core issue is structural: both ETFs rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. To fix this, YieldMax would need to reduce shared IV dependence, increase opposite directional delta, separate the option architectures, and prioritize price‑driven movement over premium harvesting. Until those changes happen, SLTY/ULTY will continue acting like correlated volatility products instead of the long/short pair implied in their filings. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:55 PM
$SLTY Across 2024–2025, SLTY and ULTY have repeatedly moved in the same direction despite being filed with the SEC as a short/long inverted pair. This isn’t happening with the other YieldMax pairs, which generally behave directionally. The issue is structural: both SLTY and ULTY rely on Tesla option‑income strategies that react more to implied volatility than price. When IV rises, both gain; when IV drops, both fall. That makes them function like correlated volatility products instead of true opposite exposure. Over the year, this has caused SLTY/ULTY to operate outside the directional parameters implied in their filings. If YieldMax intends these two to behave as a real inverted pair, the construction needs to be reworked. $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 13 at 3:19 PM
$CRSH Has anyone else noticed, that YieldMax lists SLTY as the short ETF and ULTY as the long ETF in an Inverted Pairing. Yet, over the past several months, they both move in unison more often than not as compared to the other listed Inverted ETFs. Since a short or long design as filed to the SEC must move the short position opposite the long position, it is time to start wondering if YieldMax is manipulating these 2 ETFs or if they are simply incompetent when it comes to managing the two ETFs in the manner they filed them with the SEC. It should be a rare occasion these 2 particular ETFs move in unison...not the rule. Personally, it has to be manipulation through incompetence. I like YieldMax, perhaps they need to reassign the idiot managing these two ETFs. Anyone else notice this particular discrepancy by YieldMax? ;-) $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 10 at 1:39 PM
$SLTY Inverted Pairings System — Weekly Rotation Update Lowest‑Percentage ETF Purchase: SLTY @ $22.695 System Action: Reinforcement executed this morning as SLTY rotated to the lowest slot in the 10‑ETF ladder. Price remains near the lower band, consistent with system‑cycle behavior. System Notes: SLTY’s decline triggered this week’s mechanical buy. Like the other inverted ETFs, SLTY follows cyclic rotations, and this week it reached the structural low of its cycle. MACD is tightly compressed with a small positive histogram, signaling early momentum stabilization. W%R sits deep in oversold territory, matching prior reset conditions. Price is holding just above the lower Bollinger Band, a mechanical buy zone within system rules. Money Flow has stabilized and KST is flattening. Rotation strengthens and maintains symmetry across the Inverted Pairings as the ladder rotates toward weakness. Weakness is where Inverted Pairings reset their strength. $CRSH, $DIPS, $FIAT, $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 10 at 12:14 PM
0 · Reply
Dragon_Trader_67
Dragon_Trader_67 Jul. 9 at 10:32 PM
$CRSH Inverted Pairing System — Weekly Reinforcement Update, completing Week #28. Tomorrow completes Reinforcement Week #28, leaving 24 reinforcement windows still ahead this year. Each week, the lowest‑percentage baseline ETF gets lifted, tightening the ladder and reducing volatility drag. This disciplined structure is why the system keeps grinding upward: technical charting cycle‑exhaustion buys, expanding share counts, growing dividends, bi‑monthly contributions, and cash carried forward all work together to raise the baseline week after week. Twenty‑eight consecutive baseline lifts show exactly why the system continues to strengthen the overall account balance. Consistency beats prediction, and structure beats emotion. “Raise the baseline, and the ladder rises with it.” $CRSH , $DIPS , $FIAT , $SLTY & $WNTR
0 · Reply