Sidney Resources Corp (SDRC)

$0.23 0.00 (-2.04%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 172,200
Avg Vol 225,472
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 29%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Sidney Resources Corp. develops and mines mineral properties. it explores for gold and silver deposits. The company owns interests in the Lucky Ben Mine Group properties consisting of three patented claims covering approximately 53 acres and fourteen unpatented claims that covers approximately 200 acres located in the Warren Mining District in Idaho. It also holds 100% interests in the Walla Walla Project, which includes 47 lode claims that covers 1.61 square miles located in the Marshall Lake M...

Industry: Other Precious Metals & Mining
Sector: Basic Materials
Phone: 509 552 9858
Address:
505 E Front Ave, Suite 202, Coeur d'Alene, United States
smnty
smnty Aug. 19 at 12:02 AM
$SDRC I think there could potentially be a problem with using Janus Mineral Strategy. That’s James Ingraffia’s company, the young lithium Geo that did all the stuff for BRGC/NALC. Back then it was named Lithium Arrow LLC. I believe he took a board member or management seat back then. These companies are affiliated through Sunnyland. The whole point of the Ni 43101 compliance should be to ensure impartiality with a truly qualified and registered third party designing and overseeing the sampling, being the point of contact with the labs, and writing a report that can be submitted to the SEC for instance and support a compliant mineral resource. This shouldn’t be yet one more example of SDRC’s buddy stooges/ fake third party’s in there writing their opinions. It’s absolutely necessary in this case that a buddy stooge shouldn’t be the one in there compiling data and writing these reports. I was happy to read the news that a “compliant MRE” is on deck but now I’m frustrated yet again.
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Aug. 13 at 6:04 AM
$SDRC asked Gemini to better explain the dichotomy of why an otc miner would intentionally act like their poor on a balance sheet yet spend millions on expansion projects and new employees like the outlook was a yellow brick road. Yes, Sean is playing games once again and I get that it's frustrating, but this offtake is unbelievably big with gold at $4K and rising. Not a stretch to say it Could be 100% of EV alone. "Ocean Partners signer the deal because the gold is real". Summary The company downplays the stockpile on paper because securities regulators require legal disclaimers, and accounting rules force a $0 balance-sheet entry until an official NI 43-101 report is published. Simultaneously, management is aggressively shipping samples to global traders because physical ore sales provide non-dilutive cash flow. Ocean Partners signed the deal because the gold is real, but they structured the payout to depend on final, post-crushing assays to protect their own downside. d
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Aug. 13 at 5:52 AM
$SDRC https://www.otcmarkets.com/file/company/financial-report/584890/content Before y'all freak out over cash. I asked Claude to explain the games behind making your stockpiles look worthless meanwhile global players are signing deals and governors are asking to be chairman of your board. It's all about liability. Your better off saying your broke on paper while communicating your a big dog in a way only big dogs would understand. GAAP and inventory. Yeah sean could have had the janus report ready and done last year, but that would be a huge legal and financial risk for what, short term stock bump. The next 2 quarters should be huge. If you sold, sorry about your luck but I'm rolling the dice. If you need a better explanation of why leave a comment. Played these games myself so I get it but I understand many won't.
1 · Reply
smnty
smnty Aug. 6 at 5:22 PM
$SDRC a deeper look into what we know of this offtake deal shows that it is not for a concentrate (already enriched and homogenized and probably in bins or neat, accessible piles). It is of rock that probably came straight from a mine and was dumped there 100+ years ago. The nature of the 25,000 ton Knott pile is unclear but is probably not remotely homogeneous, and is unmilled. I understand that representative sampling of a 100 year old pile of rock straight from a mine is very difficult. SDRC has not released their signed offtake agreement for public view. Besides the strict “umpire round robin” assay procedure and sampling methodologies designed to compensate for an non-homogenous pile of rock, what is ocean partners likely to include in their deal with Sidney resources that would sufficiently be protective of their interests?
2 · Reply
wagyubull
wagyubull Aug. 6 at 4:01 AM
$SDRC Its good to see somthing happening
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Aug. 4 at 7:59 PM
$SDRC Worked with Gemini to come up with a semi conservative base case net revenue for the offftake. $114M in revs. Not bad. Assumption was 10% MC. Current spot rates. 1.6 oz/ton gold which is lower end of assays but probably more accurate. The running rumor is its worth "up to" 100M so it's crazy to think the real value might be more.
1 · Reply
coinspitter
coinspitter Aug. 4 at 7:12 PM
$SDRC this is still very cheap...going to change soon! More offtakes in discussion, first revenue, profit will be visible in the upcoming earnings reports...a whole different type of investor will be looking at it soon. Profitable microcap, could soon be included in $GDXJ OR $JNUG
0 · Reply
TenFolds
TenFolds Aug. 4 at 5:56 PM
$SDRC if... they complete the mill... and get permission to mill the stockpiles... and find staff to work the mill this winter... and the stockpiles really do contain 1oz+Au/ton... and get 60% value on their ore... then they could pull in $10.8M revenue per quarter, which would be enough to pay for a more aggressive drill program and modest infrastructure improvements without dilution.
2 · Reply
TenFolds
TenFolds Aug. 4 at 5:28 PM
$SDRC you make a valid point, and mgmt understands, on track to publish an official resource estimate by early 2027. its only going to represent a tiny fraction of their claims, but we'll at least get some transparency in the next 4-7 months.
1 · Reply
stocks_2watch
stocks_2watch Aug. 4 at 4:09 PM
$SDRC Great News- Sidney Resources Secures Firm Offtake Agreement with Global Metals Trader Ocean Partners for Its Idaho Gold Ore: https://sidneyresources.com/news/sidney-resources-secures-firm-offtake-agreement-with-global-metals-trader-ocean-partners-for-its-idaho-gold-ore/
0 · Reply
Latest News on SDRC
No data available.
smnty
smnty Aug. 19 at 12:02 AM
$SDRC I think there could potentially be a problem with using Janus Mineral Strategy. That’s James Ingraffia’s company, the young lithium Geo that did all the stuff for BRGC/NALC. Back then it was named Lithium Arrow LLC. I believe he took a board member or management seat back then. These companies are affiliated through Sunnyland. The whole point of the Ni 43101 compliance should be to ensure impartiality with a truly qualified and registered third party designing and overseeing the sampling, being the point of contact with the labs, and writing a report that can be submitted to the SEC for instance and support a compliant mineral resource. This shouldn’t be yet one more example of SDRC’s buddy stooges/ fake third party’s in there writing their opinions. It’s absolutely necessary in this case that a buddy stooge shouldn’t be the one in there compiling data and writing these reports. I was happy to read the news that a “compliant MRE” is on deck but now I’m frustrated yet again.
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Aug. 13 at 6:04 AM
$SDRC asked Gemini to better explain the dichotomy of why an otc miner would intentionally act like their poor on a balance sheet yet spend millions on expansion projects and new employees like the outlook was a yellow brick road. Yes, Sean is playing games once again and I get that it's frustrating, but this offtake is unbelievably big with gold at $4K and rising. Not a stretch to say it Could be 100% of EV alone. "Ocean Partners signer the deal because the gold is real". Summary The company downplays the stockpile on paper because securities regulators require legal disclaimers, and accounting rules force a $0 balance-sheet entry until an official NI 43-101 report is published. Simultaneously, management is aggressively shipping samples to global traders because physical ore sales provide non-dilutive cash flow. Ocean Partners signed the deal because the gold is real, but they structured the payout to depend on final, post-crushing assays to protect their own downside. d
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Aug. 13 at 5:52 AM
$SDRC https://www.otcmarkets.com/file/company/financial-report/584890/content Before y'all freak out over cash. I asked Claude to explain the games behind making your stockpiles look worthless meanwhile global players are signing deals and governors are asking to be chairman of your board. It's all about liability. Your better off saying your broke on paper while communicating your a big dog in a way only big dogs would understand. GAAP and inventory. Yeah sean could have had the janus report ready and done last year, but that would be a huge legal and financial risk for what, short term stock bump. The next 2 quarters should be huge. If you sold, sorry about your luck but I'm rolling the dice. If you need a better explanation of why leave a comment. Played these games myself so I get it but I understand many won't.
1 · Reply
smnty
smnty Aug. 6 at 5:22 PM
$SDRC a deeper look into what we know of this offtake deal shows that it is not for a concentrate (already enriched and homogenized and probably in bins or neat, accessible piles). It is of rock that probably came straight from a mine and was dumped there 100+ years ago. The nature of the 25,000 ton Knott pile is unclear but is probably not remotely homogeneous, and is unmilled. I understand that representative sampling of a 100 year old pile of rock straight from a mine is very difficult. SDRC has not released their signed offtake agreement for public view. Besides the strict “umpire round robin” assay procedure and sampling methodologies designed to compensate for an non-homogenous pile of rock, what is ocean partners likely to include in their deal with Sidney resources that would sufficiently be protective of their interests?
2 · Reply
wagyubull
wagyubull Aug. 6 at 4:01 AM
$SDRC Its good to see somthing happening
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Aug. 4 at 7:59 PM
$SDRC Worked with Gemini to come up with a semi conservative base case net revenue for the offftake. $114M in revs. Not bad. Assumption was 10% MC. Current spot rates. 1.6 oz/ton gold which is lower end of assays but probably more accurate. The running rumor is its worth "up to" 100M so it's crazy to think the real value might be more.
1 · Reply
coinspitter
coinspitter Aug. 4 at 7:12 PM
$SDRC this is still very cheap...going to change soon! More offtakes in discussion, first revenue, profit will be visible in the upcoming earnings reports...a whole different type of investor will be looking at it soon. Profitable microcap, could soon be included in $GDXJ OR $JNUG
0 · Reply
TenFolds
TenFolds Aug. 4 at 5:56 PM
$SDRC if... they complete the mill... and get permission to mill the stockpiles... and find staff to work the mill this winter... and the stockpiles really do contain 1oz+Au/ton... and get 60% value on their ore... then they could pull in $10.8M revenue per quarter, which would be enough to pay for a more aggressive drill program and modest infrastructure improvements without dilution.
2 · Reply
TenFolds
TenFolds Aug. 4 at 5:28 PM
$SDRC you make a valid point, and mgmt understands, on track to publish an official resource estimate by early 2027. its only going to represent a tiny fraction of their claims, but we'll at least get some transparency in the next 4-7 months.
1 · Reply
stocks_2watch
stocks_2watch Aug. 4 at 4:09 PM
$SDRC Great News- Sidney Resources Secures Firm Offtake Agreement with Global Metals Trader Ocean Partners for Its Idaho Gold Ore: https://sidneyresources.com/news/sidney-resources-secures-firm-offtake-agreement-with-global-metals-trader-ocean-partners-for-its-idaho-gold-ore/
0 · Reply
smnty
smnty Aug. 4 at 1:17 PM
$SDRC finally secured a sale of the 25,000 stockpile for gold and silver values. Everything we have heard about this stockpile since it was found was focused around platinum group metals and rare earths. Now they are shipping it out for gold and silver values alone. Bittersweet knowing they have given up on proving the PGM’s and rare earths in the pile but it is a good day knowing that there’s a revenue source secured. Rollercoaster.
0 · Reply
coinspitter
coinspitter Aug. 4 at 12:35 PM
$SDRC $XAUUSD $GDX first offtake agreement for 25,000 wet metric tons of gold/silver ore, that is potentially worth multiple $100M. No more processing needed by Sidney, only container shipping to asia. Inflection point for the stock -> share price could see 1.00+ https://x.com/i/status/2084613567848849662
0 · Reply
smnty
smnty Aug. 3 at 2:35 PM
$SDRC is attempting to layer complex, institutional-grade securities on top of a very lightly regulated, high‑risk corporate platform. Here you have an unaudited OTC company proposing a $222.7M capital stack (conduit IRBs, EB‑5 mezzanine, sponsor equity) on the back of revenue and cash‑flow projections that it explicitly and openly admits grades, tonnages and revenue scenarios are illustrative only – not compliant resources or reserves under S‑K 1300 / NI 43‑101. The mining project appears to sit somewhere between exploration and early development planning: there is historic underground infrastructure and a built but uncommissioned 50 TPD mill, but no formal resource definition, scoping study, pre‑feasibility, feasibility, or bankable reserve base disclosed. At the very least, mine construction financing usually follows discovery → compliant MRE → economic studies (PFS/FS). It’s unusual and could pose problems that the financing story is miles ahead of the reality of the deposit.
0 · Reply
Mikiminingmouse
Mikiminingmouse Jul. 31 at 9:38 AM
$SDRC This is the kind of PR I like to see. staged $222.7M plan to scale from an existing 50 TPD mill to a 450 TPD critical minerals processing facility in Idaho. If management executes, this is a huge step from explorer toward producer
0 · Reply
TenFolds
TenFolds Jul. 30 at 7:33 PM
$SDRC mgmt needs to publish a legit resource estimate.
0 · Reply
Bearshark
Bearshark Jul. 30 at 2:58 PM
$SDRC A lot of room to run if management can get investors excited again. Aside from sentiment, we're still strategically in about the same or better place then we were at 40c a share.
0 · Reply
wagyubull
wagyubull Jul. 29 at 10:53 PM
$SDRC .16 cents is along way from .61 cents. Just saying
1 · Reply
harrijakey
harrijakey Jul. 29 at 3:32 PM
$SDRC
0 · Reply
stocks_2watch
stocks_2watch Jul. 29 at 2:47 PM
$SDRC, Sidney Resources Corporation Advances $222.7 Million Plan to Build a 450-Ton-Per-Day Critical-Minerals Mill in Idaho: https://sidneyresources.com/news/sidney-resources-corporation-advances-222-7-million-plan-to-build-a-450-ton-per-day-critical-minerals-mill-in-idaho-projecting-hundreds-of-new-american-jobs/
0 · Reply
coinspitter
coinspitter Jul. 29 at 1:02 PM
$SDRC
0 · Reply
coinspitter
coinspitter Jul. 29 at 12:49 PM
$SDRC $GDXJ $IDR MEGA NEWS $222M non-dilutive financing for 450tpd mill for this <100m market cap company, projected cash flows based on 50 tpd mill in screenshot. Multiple 100% gains in the upcoming weeks IMO. Source: https://sidneyresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SDRC_450TPD_Economic_Impact_Study_-final.pdf
1 · Reply
Paddledick
Paddledick Jul. 28 at 9:43 PM
$SDRC very nice,got us back to the low teens.You guys are really good at what you do.Baahhaaaa.F'n losers.
0 · Reply