Market Cap 0.00
Revenue (ttm) 24.12M
Net Income (ttm) 11.50M
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin N/A
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 162,213
Avg Vol N/A
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out 0.00
Stochastic %K N/A
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Oriental Rise Holdings Limited, through its subsidiaries, engages in planting, cultivating, processing, and selling of primarily-processed tea in Mainland China. The company offers primarily-processed black and white tea, and refined tea. It sells its products to the tea business operators and end-user retail customers. The company was incorporated in 2019 and is based in Ningde, China.

Industry: Packaged Foods
Sector: Consumer Defensive
Phone: 86 59 3838 6777
Address:
No. 48 Xianyu Road, Shuangcheng Town Zherong County, Ningde, China
Zack9811
Zack9811 May. 13 at 10:41 AM
$ORIS đź’© with all my gains this year on other stocks. I need this dog for a good write off.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 10:15 PM
$ORIS the fact that this is up 3% today is a big deal
0 · Reply
Zack9811
Zack9811 May. 12 at 9:52 PM
$ORIS one word. đź’©
0 · Reply
Adv701
Adv701 May. 12 at 7:35 PM
$ORIS The issue isn’t whether ORIS can do a buyback — it’s why management shows no interest in doing one
0 · Reply
shnitzerbittle
shnitzerbittle May. 12 at 6:52 PM
$ORIS Company claims it has 9.57 dollars per share in cash but won't buy a single share to get into compliance when the share price is 40 cents. If that isn't a red flag to you, then IDK what would be.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:50 PM
$ORIS So no, a buyback is not the only path. In fact, if they need public float and liquidity, buying shares back could make compliance harder, not easier. The real question is whether ORIS can validate the balance sheet, execute on acquisitions/revenue, and regain Nasdaq compliance without destroying shareholders. That’s the debate not “no buyback = smoking gun.”
1 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:50 PM
$ORIS You’re mixing Nasdaq compliance rules like they all have to be solved by a buyback, and that’s not accurate. A buyback reduces public float, so it can actually work against the public share count/public float requirement you’re bringing up. Market cap, bid price, and public float are separate compliance issues with different possible remedies such as reverse split for bid price, business execution/asset validation/PR/catalysts for market value, hearings/extensions for timing, and maintaining float through registered shares or shareholder distribution. Also, “balance sheet vs market cap doesn’t make sense” is exactly the bull argument. The market is discounting trust, liquidity, China micro-cap risk, dilution fear, and compliance uncertainty. That doesn’t prove the cash is fake; it proves the market doesn’t trust it yet.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:48 PM
$ORIS “Necessary” is your opinion, not a fact. A buyback isn’t the only path to compliance, especially for a small-cap growth company trying to preserve cash for operations, acquisitions, expansion, or strategic flexibility. Companies facing Nasdaq issues use multiple tools extensions, hearings, restructuring, partnerships, revenue growth, reverse splits, capital raises, insider support, etc. If management truly believes future catalysts can raise valuation organically, burning cash on open-market buybacks at this stage may actually be the less responsible move. A buyback also doesn’t guarantee sustained compliance if the market just sells back into it afterward. Calling the absence of a buyback a “smoking gun” ignores how many listed companies regain compliance without one.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:35 PM
$ORIS And reverse splits/offerings by themselves don’t prove fraud either nearly every emerging growth company on Nasdaq has used them at some point to maintain listing compliance or raise capital. The real question is whether the company eventually converts those raises into growth and fundamentals. You’re treating “no buyback” as definitive proof the company is worthless, when in reality it’s just one strategic choice among many. Markets have also massively undervalued legitimate companies before. Nobody knows for certain how this plays out yet, but acting like the absence of a buyback is some guaranteed smoking gun is oversimplifying how public companies actually operate.
2 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:35 PM
$ORIS A company buying back shares isn’t automatically the “smart” move for every microcap, especially one focused on growth, acquisitions, expansion, or preserving balance sheet flexibility. A lot of Nasdaq small caps avoid aggressive buybacks because cash on hand is often being reserved for operations, M&A, compliance strategy, or financing leverage not because the cash is fake. Also, if management believed a major catalyst, acquisition closing, restructuring, or revenue expansion could materially revalue the company later, using cash today for buybacks instead of execution could actually hurt long-term shareholder value.
0 · Reply
Latest News on ORIS
Oriental Rise receives Nasdaq staff delisting determination

2026-04-21T00:20:30.000Z - 22 days ago

Oriental Rise receives Nasdaq staff delisting determination


Oriental Rise Receives Nasdaq Staff Delisting Determination

Apr 20, 2026, 7:50 PM EDT - 22 days ago

Oriental Rise Receives Nasdaq Staff Delisting Determination


Oriental Rise regains Nasdaq compliance

2026-01-15T20:30:23.000Z - 4 months ago

Oriental Rise regains Nasdaq compliance


Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading halted, news pending

2025-12-30T00:50:17.000Z - 4 months ago

Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading halted, news pending


Is Oriental Rise Stock (ORIS) the Target of a Meme Rally?

2025-08-09T01:04:00.000Z - 9 months ago

Is Oriental Rise Stock (ORIS) the Target of a Meme Rally?


Oriental Rise prices 14.8M units at 46.81c in public offering

2025-07-22T12:50:38.000Z - 10 months ago

Oriental Rise prices 14.8M units at 46.81c in public offering


Oriental Rise receives noncompliance notification from Nasdaq

2025-07-07T19:10:10.000Z - 11 months ago

Oriental Rise receives noncompliance notification from Nasdaq


Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading resumes

2024-12-06T14:36:21.000Z - 1 year ago

Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading resumes


Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading resumes

2024-12-05T17:35:24.000Z - 1 year ago

Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading resumes


Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading resumes

2024-12-03T20:40:16.000Z - 1 year ago

Oriental Rise Holdings Ltd trading resumes


Zack9811
Zack9811 May. 13 at 10:41 AM
$ORIS đź’© with all my gains this year on other stocks. I need this dog for a good write off.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 10:15 PM
$ORIS the fact that this is up 3% today is a big deal
0 · Reply
Zack9811
Zack9811 May. 12 at 9:52 PM
$ORIS one word. đź’©
0 · Reply
Adv701
Adv701 May. 12 at 7:35 PM
$ORIS The issue isn’t whether ORIS can do a buyback — it’s why management shows no interest in doing one
0 · Reply
shnitzerbittle
shnitzerbittle May. 12 at 6:52 PM
$ORIS Company claims it has 9.57 dollars per share in cash but won't buy a single share to get into compliance when the share price is 40 cents. If that isn't a red flag to you, then IDK what would be.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:50 PM
$ORIS So no, a buyback is not the only path. In fact, if they need public float and liquidity, buying shares back could make compliance harder, not easier. The real question is whether ORIS can validate the balance sheet, execute on acquisitions/revenue, and regain Nasdaq compliance without destroying shareholders. That’s the debate not “no buyback = smoking gun.”
1 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:50 PM
$ORIS You’re mixing Nasdaq compliance rules like they all have to be solved by a buyback, and that’s not accurate. A buyback reduces public float, so it can actually work against the public share count/public float requirement you’re bringing up. Market cap, bid price, and public float are separate compliance issues with different possible remedies such as reverse split for bid price, business execution/asset validation/PR/catalysts for market value, hearings/extensions for timing, and maintaining float through registered shares or shareholder distribution. Also, “balance sheet vs market cap doesn’t make sense” is exactly the bull argument. The market is discounting trust, liquidity, China micro-cap risk, dilution fear, and compliance uncertainty. That doesn’t prove the cash is fake; it proves the market doesn’t trust it yet.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:48 PM
$ORIS “Necessary” is your opinion, not a fact. A buyback isn’t the only path to compliance, especially for a small-cap growth company trying to preserve cash for operations, acquisitions, expansion, or strategic flexibility. Companies facing Nasdaq issues use multiple tools extensions, hearings, restructuring, partnerships, revenue growth, reverse splits, capital raises, insider support, etc. If management truly believes future catalysts can raise valuation organically, burning cash on open-market buybacks at this stage may actually be the less responsible move. A buyback also doesn’t guarantee sustained compliance if the market just sells back into it afterward. Calling the absence of a buyback a “smoking gun” ignores how many listed companies regain compliance without one.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:35 PM
$ORIS And reverse splits/offerings by themselves don’t prove fraud either nearly every emerging growth company on Nasdaq has used them at some point to maintain listing compliance or raise capital. The real question is whether the company eventually converts those raises into growth and fundamentals. You’re treating “no buyback” as definitive proof the company is worthless, when in reality it’s just one strategic choice among many. Markets have also massively undervalued legitimate companies before. Nobody knows for certain how this plays out yet, but acting like the absence of a buyback is some guaranteed smoking gun is oversimplifying how public companies actually operate.
2 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:35 PM
$ORIS A company buying back shares isn’t automatically the “smart” move for every microcap, especially one focused on growth, acquisitions, expansion, or preserving balance sheet flexibility. A lot of Nasdaq small caps avoid aggressive buybacks because cash on hand is often being reserved for operations, M&A, compliance strategy, or financing leverage not because the cash is fake. Also, if management believed a major catalyst, acquisition closing, restructuring, or revenue expansion could materially revalue the company later, using cash today for buybacks instead of execution could actually hurt long-term shareholder value.
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 6:19 PM
$ORIS dude… you really need to educate yourself. I guarantee you’re losing tons of money and never made a buck in the market 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Corporate cash isn’t a meme trading account. Public companies can’t just YOLO buy shares to force compliance. Cash may be allocated for operations, acquisitions, and growth initiatives. Sustainable price appreciation comes from execution and fundamentals, not a one-time liquidity spike from a buyback.
1 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 12 at 5:51 PM
$ORIS lmao no they wouldn’t
1 · Reply
shnitzerbittle
shnitzerbittle May. 12 at 5:37 PM
$ORIS If the cash this company claims to have was real they would just buy a million shares and push the price up to a dollar
0 · Reply
EnemySwim
EnemySwim May. 12 at 2:07 PM
$ORIS $81 million in assets, $2 million in debt >>>>>Equity $19/share and profitable and current SP is 40 cents due to expansion plan in the works and taking far too long to get it in place and inept management of the share price…….still, things have a way of balancing and this goes over $10/share.
0 · Reply
Cavve
Cavve May. 11 at 8:02 PM
$ORIS It's strange, I know. 0,40+
0 · Reply
Cavve
Cavve May. 11 at 3:23 PM
$ORIS it has done it once before, but has recovered at the close or the day after, but it really doesn't matter because I still believe in a mega squeeze
1 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 11 at 3:16 PM
$ORIS yep - finally broke .40. Not good smh
0 · Reply
Gkon123
Gkon123 May. 11 at 3:06 PM
$ORIS Welp it dropped below 0.40
0 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 11 at 12:33 PM
$ORIS still won’t break .40 lol
0 · Reply
Zack9811
Zack9811 May. 11 at 12:33 PM
$ORIS this is the biggest piece of crap out there. The biggest shell game on the plant.
1 · Reply
TheHomelander1
TheHomelander1 May. 11 at 12:25 PM
$ORIS so no word what the
1 · Reply
Chasingeeseandbears1507
Chasingeeseandbears1507 May. 9 at 9:46 PM
$ORIS lmao ya ok
0 · Reply