Nano One Materials Corp (NNOMF)

$0.57 -0.02 (-3.91%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 59,000
Avg Vol 80,710
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 40%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Nano One Materials Corp. operates as a process technology company transforming cathode active material production for lithium-ion batteries in Canada. The company offers One-PotTM, a process to produce cathode active materials for lithium-ion battery applications in electric vehicles, energy storage systems, and consumer electronics. Nano One Materials Corp. was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Burnaby, Canada.

Industry: Specialty Chemicals
Sector: Basic Materials
Phone: 604-420-2041
Website: nanoone.ca
Address:
8575 Government Street, Unit 101B, Burnaby, Canada
PMFRTiger
PMFRTiger Aug. 21 at 2:06 PM
$NNOMF fed to the F'ing wolves by that pos old ceo. Fuck this company. Can't believe I fell for it and lost like 80%
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 18 at 3:54 PM
$NNOMF une 17: CEO buys 12,500 @ C$0.78 June 22: Chairman buys 60,000 @ C$0.82 June 25: Nano One/Worley announce commercial One-Pot CAM Package July 23: Candiac engineering reaches 85% August 12: Q2 results + funding update August 13: Standard Lithium feedstock produces LFP at ~155 mAh/
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 17 at 2:28 PM
$NNOMF Can they get to the first meaningful commercial agreement before they need a large equity raise ? That is the question.
0 · Reply
Whizz_123
Whizz_123 Aug. 16 at 12:51 AM
$NNOMF I like the current 0.5$ range. I will load up as much as I can untill Halloween. Everyone else be careful not to invest in this because it is like watching paint dry with this company.
0 · Reply
Lithium_boom
Lithium_boom Aug. 14 at 3:52 PM
$NNOMF Testing, making big promises, testing even more and for longer, and making even bigger promises. There are significant delays, and there are no commercial customers yet. Thanks to all the subsidy income, NANO’s laboratory is in no rush. NANO’s investors are facing historically low share prices.
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 13 at 9:56 PM
$NNOMF Nano One says SMM spent two years on development, performance testing, economic modelling and IP review before expanding the relationship in September 2025
0 · Reply
EllonM
EllonM Aug. 13 at 8:54 PM
$NNOMF https://lasvegassun.com/news/2026/aug/13/nano-one-and-standard-lithium-collaborate-to-quali/
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 12 at 2:24 PM
$NNOMF the last 3 years ‘this stock has go from 3 dollars to 50 cents that’s not very good but it does have a small glimmer of hope but another long stent of nothing would put this in the ?…
0 · Reply
ERadar
ERadar Aug. 12 at 3:36 AM
$NNOMF been waiting. Well another 6 years if it takes that long. Opportunity cost huh.. it will be worth it! Yeah brah 🦧 https://media3.giphy.com/media/JZDjb9Zlf7RaLGWOWo/giphy.gif?cid=09f12532fvqx19550prwsp6ejukfx49yhmqu0kwp743z7qfz&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 11 at 11:59 AM
$NNOMF I waiting but it’s been so long I hope I am alive
0 · Reply
Latest News on NNOMF
No data available.
PMFRTiger
PMFRTiger Aug. 21 at 2:06 PM
$NNOMF fed to the F'ing wolves by that pos old ceo. Fuck this company. Can't believe I fell for it and lost like 80%
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 18 at 3:54 PM
$NNOMF une 17: CEO buys 12,500 @ C$0.78 June 22: Chairman buys 60,000 @ C$0.82 June 25: Nano One/Worley announce commercial One-Pot CAM Package July 23: Candiac engineering reaches 85% August 12: Q2 results + funding update August 13: Standard Lithium feedstock produces LFP at ~155 mAh/
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 17 at 2:28 PM
$NNOMF Can they get to the first meaningful commercial agreement before they need a large equity raise ? That is the question.
0 · Reply
Whizz_123
Whizz_123 Aug. 16 at 12:51 AM
$NNOMF I like the current 0.5$ range. I will load up as much as I can untill Halloween. Everyone else be careful not to invest in this because it is like watching paint dry with this company.
0 · Reply
Lithium_boom
Lithium_boom Aug. 14 at 3:52 PM
$NNOMF Testing, making big promises, testing even more and for longer, and making even bigger promises. There are significant delays, and there are no commercial customers yet. Thanks to all the subsidy income, NANO’s laboratory is in no rush. NANO’s investors are facing historically low share prices.
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 13 at 9:56 PM
$NNOMF Nano One says SMM spent two years on development, performance testing, economic modelling and IP review before expanding the relationship in September 2025
0 · Reply
EllonM
EllonM Aug. 13 at 8:54 PM
$NNOMF https://lasvegassun.com/news/2026/aug/13/nano-one-and-standard-lithium-collaborate-to-quali/
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 12 at 2:24 PM
$NNOMF the last 3 years ‘this stock has go from 3 dollars to 50 cents that’s not very good but it does have a small glimmer of hope but another long stent of nothing would put this in the ?…
0 · Reply
ERadar
ERadar Aug. 12 at 3:36 AM
$NNOMF been waiting. Well another 6 years if it takes that long. Opportunity cost huh.. it will be worth it! Yeah brah 🦧 https://media3.giphy.com/media/JZDjb9Zlf7RaLGWOWo/giphy.gif?cid=09f12532fvqx19550prwsp6ejukfx49yhmqu0kwp743z7qfz&ep=v1_gifs_gifId&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 11 at 11:59 AM
$NNOMF I waiting but it’s been so long I hope I am alive
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 11 at 6:22 AM
$NNOMF Nano One has said its public target is to secure initial commercial LFP supply agreements for defence and energy-storage applications by the end of 2026. They stated it in February, repeated it in March, and then reiterated it in the June shareholder letter. I’m waiting.
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 7 at 3:52 PM
$NNOMF how many years does it take ha ha 😂
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 7 at 2:32 PM
$NNOMF they had the advantage and dropped it !!!!…
0 · Reply
ERadar
ERadar Aug. 6 at 9:08 PM
$NNOMF when will this go back above $2. Had this above $5 and thought this may be going to $50 lol.. cathode material reducing so much .. bottlenecks etc. water, processing.. and the hedge against China. Hmmm. What is going on!!!
0 · Reply
NoCobaltguy
NoCobaltguy Aug. 4 at 10:53 PM
$NNOMF Nanonone nice job, but you missed two that will definitely be using Nano Ones GREEN LFP Technology. Nano One’s partner SUMITOMO and their partner TOYOTA!
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 4 at 4:54 PM
$NNOMF from 3.50 to 50 the best stock ever years of promises and now another one WOW happy day’s
0 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Aug. 4 at 4:45 PM
$NNOMF I hope it’s not like the last 5 years blowing smoke up my
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 4 at 2:19 PM
$NNOMF
0 · Reply
Whizz_123
Whizz_123 Aug. 3 at 6:29 PM
$NNOMF what did ai miss? Seems like another nothing burger PR
0 · Reply
Nanonone
Nanonone Aug. 3 at 3:20 PM
$NNOMF Great work by the Nano one team. This is another significant step closer to de-risking the technology to full commercial scale. The Worley team is engineering a 25ktpa plant in parallel, getting it ready for market. A detailed pre-licensing pack is available for interested parties, so do get in touch. Technology scale up is never easy. Doing it together with a highly skilled team is a joy!
2 · Reply
Kevin4540
Kevin4540 Jul. 28 at 11:33 AM
$NNOMF I am not a fan of China but the would have a factory up and running in months Nano has been working on factories and cathodes for years
1 · Reply
Lithium_boom
Lithium_boom Jul. 27 at 11:22 AM
$NNOMF It is deafeningly quiet at NANO. It has now emerged that they are 85% of the way through the development and testing process. For the time being, investors cannot expect any developments until sometime in 2027; nor are there likely to be any commercial partners yet. This subsidy-driven company has sufficient funds to continue experimenting. Unfortunately, there is a lack of transparent communication with shareholders. Meanwhile, the company's share price is sliding toward a historic low, and the decline does not yet appear to be over.
0 · Reply