Mbak Energy Solutions Inc (MBAK)

$0.00 +0.00 (3.45%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 2,096,600
Avg Vol 2,929,030
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 38%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. engages in the development, manufacturing and commercialization of non fossil fuel energy products. Its products include lithium, sodium, and solid state batteries and battery manufacturing and supply chain equipment for industrial, medical, portable electronics and EV application. It also manufactures and sells E-Taxi bikes. MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. was formerly knowns as Alternet Systems, Inc. and changed its name to MBAK Energy Solutions Inc. in June 2025. MBAK En...

Industry: Recreational Vehicles
Sector: Consumer Cyclical
Phone: 508 356 5433
Address:
Wilmington Trade Center Building 3, 3940 US Highway 421N, Wilmington, United States
Taz69
Taz69 Jul. 3 at 5:21 AM
$MBAK Accumulate cheapies...Jimmydog is going to get vaporized!
0 · Reply
Christo66
Christo66 Jul. 1 at 12:07 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ just so we’re clear, I requested you furnish this forum with your primary reasons for your disdain of Chairwoman Boos, MBAK as a company, and the incessant, borderline obsessive postings whereas you’ve chosen ihub and ST as your personal amphitheaters for your musings. To date my request has gone ignored. So I ask again. Why are you here? What is your beef? Please do tell, for all of us uneducated, underrepresented, and less than capable of making intelligent decisions on what to do with our monies…
1 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 10:39 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — correct. Zambian energy ministers don't use Contact Us pages. But MBAK's retail investors do. The website wasn't built for project financiers — it was cited in MBAK's own press release to establish legitimacy for shareholders. The question isn't how Letsatsi communicates with ministry officials. The question is why MBAK directed its investors to a website that redirects to Indonesian gambling — and why nobody has fixed it even after public exposure. The website was built for you. Not for Zambian ministry officials.
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 29 at 9:57 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Honestly, your obsession with this company is gonna get you sick. You are trying so hard to force a conspiracy theory that you are completely applying consumer retail logic to industrial B2B infrastructure. Do you honestly believe a Zambian energy minister or a project finance lawyer logs onto a public WordPress site to check the "Contact Us" tab? No. They communicate through dedicated, secure corporate email networks, encrypted data rooms, bank-to-bank SWIFT portals, and direct phone lines to the executive team. The public website has zero utility to the actual people funding a $57.5M project. Letsatsi Power’s "customers" aren't retail consumers trying to buy products online with a credit card. Their customers are Zambian state ministry officials, utility grid directors, and institutional project financiers.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 9:25 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — agreed. Sophisticated companies get hacked too. But they also fix it within hours, because customers notify them, staff notices, and their business depends on it. A hacked website is an IT problem. A hacked website nobody fixes even after public exposure is evidence of no active operations: no customers to complain, no staff to notice, no business to protect.
0 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 29 at 7:32 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Sophisticated domain hijacking, malicious DNS redirection, and WordPress database injections happen to multi-billion dollar conglomerates, government entities, and small businesses alike. When an enterprise website gets compromised and redirects to an offshore gambling link like a slot site, it means their third-party web hosting server or IT registrar was breached. It is a digital security failure, not a sign that the physical company or its underlying grid contracts don't exist It shows their back-office IT support is asleep at the wheel. But using a hijacked website to claim that a physical energy storage manufacturing pipeline is fake is a massive logical leap.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 1:11 PM
$MBAK On March 25, 2026, MBAK named LETSATSI Power South Africa as its exclusive partner for a $57.5M Zambian BESS project. Today their website redirects to an Indonesian slot machine platform: https://letsatsipower.com/news-update/ Click "News Updates." "Our Team." "Contact Us." All three redirect to DEPOBOS88. Lucky Spin. Minimum deposit Rp 10,000. 18+ only. A real energy company executing a $57.5M project with international lenders would notice their website redirecting to online gambling within hours. This has been broken and unmonitored for weeks. Does this look like a company that has ordered, paid, and is currently waiting to receive a delivery of products from MBAK out of China for a $57.5M project?
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 24 at 3:22 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Your critique is entirely valid—Africa should be the near-term catalyst while India builds its moat. The silence isn't a sign of a fake market; it’s the classic symptom of an over-leveraged startup supply chain where a delay at the primary anchor destination causes a temporary cash and logistics freeze across the minor lanes. The thesis hasn't broken, but the operational execution is entirely bottlenecked at the origin point. We are waiting to see if management can decouple the African logistics lane and monetize it independently while India grinds through the NABL accreditation process.
1 · Reply
Gonefishin365
Gonefishin365 Jun. 24 at 1:32 PM
$MBAK so are these little premarket jumps over four cents just the market testing what the breakout prices might be? I’m just curious why a few times now it’s gone over four cents in premarket.
1 · Reply
Taz69
Taz69 Jun. 23 at 11:04 PM
$MBAK ACCUMULATE while we wait for news!
0 · Reply
Latest News on MBAK
No data available.
Taz69
Taz69 Jul. 3 at 5:21 AM
$MBAK Accumulate cheapies...Jimmydog is going to get vaporized!
0 · Reply
Christo66
Christo66 Jul. 1 at 12:07 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ just so we’re clear, I requested you furnish this forum with your primary reasons for your disdain of Chairwoman Boos, MBAK as a company, and the incessant, borderline obsessive postings whereas you’ve chosen ihub and ST as your personal amphitheaters for your musings. To date my request has gone ignored. So I ask again. Why are you here? What is your beef? Please do tell, for all of us uneducated, underrepresented, and less than capable of making intelligent decisions on what to do with our monies…
1 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 10:39 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — correct. Zambian energy ministers don't use Contact Us pages. But MBAK's retail investors do. The website wasn't built for project financiers — it was cited in MBAK's own press release to establish legitimacy for shareholders. The question isn't how Letsatsi communicates with ministry officials. The question is why MBAK directed its investors to a website that redirects to Indonesian gambling — and why nobody has fixed it even after public exposure. The website was built for you. Not for Zambian ministry officials.
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 29 at 9:57 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Honestly, your obsession with this company is gonna get you sick. You are trying so hard to force a conspiracy theory that you are completely applying consumer retail logic to industrial B2B infrastructure. Do you honestly believe a Zambian energy minister or a project finance lawyer logs onto a public WordPress site to check the "Contact Us" tab? No. They communicate through dedicated, secure corporate email networks, encrypted data rooms, bank-to-bank SWIFT portals, and direct phone lines to the executive team. The public website has zero utility to the actual people funding a $57.5M project. Letsatsi Power’s "customers" aren't retail consumers trying to buy products online with a credit card. Their customers are Zambian state ministry officials, utility grid directors, and institutional project financiers.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 9:25 PM
$MBAK @Mangood — agreed. Sophisticated companies get hacked too. But they also fix it within hours, because customers notify them, staff notices, and their business depends on it. A hacked website is an IT problem. A hacked website nobody fixes even after public exposure is evidence of no active operations: no customers to complain, no staff to notice, no business to protect.
0 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 29 at 7:32 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Sophisticated domain hijacking, malicious DNS redirection, and WordPress database injections happen to multi-billion dollar conglomerates, government entities, and small businesses alike. When an enterprise website gets compromised and redirects to an offshore gambling link like a slot site, it means their third-party web hosting server or IT registrar was breached. It is a digital security failure, not a sign that the physical company or its underlying grid contracts don't exist It shows their back-office IT support is asleep at the wheel. But using a hijacked website to claim that a physical energy storage manufacturing pipeline is fake is a massive logical leap.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 29 at 1:11 PM
$MBAK On March 25, 2026, MBAK named LETSATSI Power South Africa as its exclusive partner for a $57.5M Zambian BESS project. Today their website redirects to an Indonesian slot machine platform: https://letsatsipower.com/news-update/ Click "News Updates." "Our Team." "Contact Us." All three redirect to DEPOBOS88. Lucky Spin. Minimum deposit Rp 10,000. 18+ only. A real energy company executing a $57.5M project with international lenders would notice their website redirecting to online gambling within hours. This has been broken and unmonitored for weeks. Does this look like a company that has ordered, paid, and is currently waiting to receive a delivery of products from MBAK out of China for a $57.5M project?
1 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 24 at 3:22 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Your critique is entirely valid—Africa should be the near-term catalyst while India builds its moat. The silence isn't a sign of a fake market; it’s the classic symptom of an over-leveraged startup supply chain where a delay at the primary anchor destination causes a temporary cash and logistics freeze across the minor lanes. The thesis hasn't broken, but the operational execution is entirely bottlenecked at the origin point. We are waiting to see if management can decouple the African logistics lane and monetize it independently while India grinds through the NABL accreditation process.
1 · Reply
Gonefishin365
Gonefishin365 Jun. 24 at 1:32 PM
$MBAK so are these little premarket jumps over four cents just the market testing what the breakout prices might be? I’m just curious why a few times now it’s gone over four cents in premarket.
1 · Reply
Taz69
Taz69 Jun. 23 at 11:04 PM
$MBAK ACCUMULATE while we wait for news!
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 23 at 1:11 PM
$MBAK @Mangood Let's use the most favorable assumption: the lab exists and the 3-6 months refers to NABL accreditation already in process since May 18. Under that assumption: NABL completes August-November 2026. BIS product certification follows. Most optimistic delivery to an Indian customer: late 2026/early 2027. MBAK's April 29 PR committed to 40 MWh to India by June 2026. Management knew May 18 the certification didn't exist. The June commitment was issued anyway. This also clarifies the payment issue. A customer cannot pay for product that cannot legally be imported or delivered. The payment delay and the delivery delay are the same structural problem. One unanswered question: Boos stated explicitly on the May 18 call that Africa has no certification barriers and no payment issues. Why have the March 18 Africa shipments also not been confirmed delivered? If India is complex, Africa should be the path of least resistance. Why is Africa also silent?
2 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 22 at 3:26 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Part 2 The April 29 PR logged "confirmed shipment" because the factory completed the 55 MWh build and handed it off to the logistics origin warehouse. The earnings call provided the necessary on-the-ground context: production is finished, but physical transit is paused until the local Indian testing pipeline is structurally ready. Has a customer taken final delivery yet? No. The data says they haven't. Turnaround micro-caps are notoriously messy, and PR goals routinely collide with international red tape. You see a dead end because names aren't on a shipping manifest today. I see a company that finished 55 MWh of advanced hardware and is wading through the grueling chore of building a localized regulatory moat to permanently unlock a $65 million order book. The timeline slipped, but the macro macro demand hasn't changed. Now we watch Phase 1 of the lab build-out.
3 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 22 at 3:23 PM
$MBAK @otc_watchdog_ Part 1 You’ve tracked the PR history perfectly, and nobody is denying the dates you posted. The timeline pushed out—that is an objective fact. But if you think a multi-month delay means a global infrastructure play is dead, you don't understand how international energy logistics work. Standard sea freight takes 45 days if you clear customs. As Boos stated on the May 18th call, the 11 BESS units are physically built and sitting in a Chinese warehouse. Why haven't they left? Because shipping multi-megawatt grid batteries without pre-stamped regional certifications is an easy way to get your cargo seized at the destination port. The timeline isn't "unshaded fiction." It was explicitly given by Dr. Konda Shiva’s technical team during the May 18th Q&A session. They openly guided that building, equipping, and securing national NABL/BIS accreditation for a high-voltage testing hub takes 90 to 180 Days.
0 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 22 at 12:40 PM
$MBAK @Mangood "Playing out exactly as laid out" — let's check that against the actual record: — October 27, 2025: 100 MWh to India by April 30, 2026. Now 53 days overdue. — March 18, 2026: Shipments to India and Zambia already underway. 96 days ago. — April 29, 2026: "Confirmed on-time shipment" of eleven BESS units. Contradicted 19 days later on MBAK's own earnings call by Boos herself containers still in China, customer hadn't paid, certification lab didn't exist. — April 29, 2026: "Beginning of delivery" of ESS systems to Kenyan coffee farmers — 54 days ago, no follow-up — April 29, 2026: Additional 40 MWh to India by June 2026. June ends in 8 days. Standard sea freight from China to India or Zambia takes a maximum of 45 days door-to-door. The March shipments should have arrived by early May at the latest. Where is the 3-to-6 month certification timeline sourced from? It is not public information. Has a single customer taken physical delivery of a single BESS unit?
2 · Reply
Mangood
Mangood Jun. 20 at 5:13 PM
$MBAK With June officially moving past its midpoint, the original delivery targets are playing out exactly as Dr. Konda Shiva laid out on the May 18th earnings call. We know the 11 completed BESS units are waiting at the origin point in China, and the operational focus has completely shifted to constructing and certifying the domestic infrastructure lab in India. Since that facility build-out carries a 3-to-6-month timeline, short-term momentum day traders have moved on, leaving only long-term position builders sitting on the bid.
1 · Reply
Christo66
Christo66 Jun. 18 at 8:48 PM
$MBAK reminder markets are closed tomorrow so Jimmy is picking up an extra shift bagging at the piggly wiggly… In a world where you can be anything… don’t be a Jimmy.
2 · Reply
Christo66
Christo66 Jun. 18 at 4:59 PM
$MBAK be wary of these traps
0 · Reply
Taz69
Taz69 Jun. 18 at 2:24 PM
$MBAK ACCUMULATE!
0 · Reply
Justcantwin1
Justcantwin1 Jun. 18 at 2:09 PM
$MBAK Seems like some called $NEOV is in the same business as us. Or at least similar.
0 · Reply
Taz69
Taz69 Jun. 17 at 3:39 PM
$MBAK Cheapies getting scooped up! Jimmy is spinning in the bowl😂...when news hits we pop! NFA,LG!
0 · Reply
FunCoupons00
FunCoupons00 Jun. 17 at 3:09 PM
$MBAK was there any buy/sells this morning? Wth 0.047 is insane
2 · Reply
otc_watchdog_
otc_watchdog_ Jun. 17 at 2:53 PM
$MBAK @NoseToTheGrindstone MBAK opened 9:30:00 with two fills at $0.047 — 17x yesterday's close of $0.0027. No bid was present pre-market, only a placeholder ask. Market makers routinely widen spreads pre-market for inventory risk management. In this case there was no bid at all — meaning the MM had no interest in acquiring MBAK inventory at any price, but was technically willing to sell at an inflated placeholder level. When the session opened, market orders queued pre-market swept that ask automatically. Both prints cleared within one second before the ask reset to $0.0028. This is not a buyer seeing value at $0.047. It is two market orders filling against a nominal quote with no real depth behind it. In thinly quoted OTC names, market orders at open can fill against placeholder asks.
1 · Reply