Intermap Technologies Corp (ITMSF)

$1.27 +0.04 (3.25%)
Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) 0.00
Net Income (ttm) 0.00
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume 44,500
Avg Vol 124,666
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 50%
Beta N/A
Analysts Strong Buy
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

Intermap Technologies Corporation, a geospatial intelligence company, provides various geospatial solutions and analytics in the United States, the Asia Pacific, and Europe. The company offers core digital map products comprising digital surface model, a digital elevation model that measures the top surface of the earth and objects located on it; digital terrain model, a geometrically correct reference frame over which other data layers, such as aerial photography and other types of images; mult...

Industry: Software - Application
Sector: Technology
Phone: 303 708 0955
Address:
385 Inverness Parkway, Suite 105, Englewood, United States
Poundsandliberals
Poundsandliberals Jul. 4 at 1:54 PM
$ITMSF Issues of Indonesia sovereignty and information security and the specifications of the project that Intermap meets better than the other bidders combined with Intermap’s previous performance and partnership with an Indonesian company in the first phase of the One Map project all seem to favor the huge non-urban phase being awarded to Intermap, deapite the technological bid scoring. Any other opinions for or against?
0 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jul. 3 at 1:37 PM
$ITMSF No big surprise, moved to July 10th
1 · Reply
Nhearld10
Nhearld10 Jun. 26 at 10:13 PM
$ITMSF pretty sure that’s the only date that matters. Until they move it 3 times.
1 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 26 at 2:59 PM
$ITMSF is anyone seeing trading activity this morning?
2 · Reply
hanman0322
hanman0322 Jun. 26 at 12:40 PM
$ITMSF I think this takes a few more months…
0 · Reply
AaronRho
AaronRho Jun. 26 at 12:34 PM
$ITMSF As I anticipated there is a move of the date of notice intention to award to July 4th. There is a lot going on in the background here when there likely shouldn’t be if it were a normal process without all the data sovereignty issues. Very embarrassing process for BIG in my opinion. Especially if they do all this show just to award it to ITMSF. They should have got it right the first time and failed any company that didn’t meet the requirements of IFSAR sensor and platform to fly it on. ( as stipulated in the RFP) If they did indeed rate a satellite SAR and airborne LiDAR mix so highly, they scored it wrong from the beginning. As a side note for you all copying and pasting AI trash, be wary that those LLMs are sycophants that will soothe your confirmation bias and tell you what you want to hear. It has been so wrong throughout this process but is made to sound confident. It just adds to the noise.
2 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 26 at 4:36 AM
$ITMSF interesting https://disway.id/amp/954151/proyek-geospasial-didominasi-vendor-cina-kpk-watch-minta-big-terbuka-soal-proses-tender/16
3 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 26 at 4:27 AM
$ITMSF https://www.akurat.co/nasional/868698/kpk-watch-soroti-dominasi-vendor-china-di-tender-big-pertanyakan-kedaulatan-data-geospasial-nasional
0 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 25 at 8:59 PM
$ITMSF All eyes will be on tonight to see if any news emerges. One positive outcome, regardless of the procurement process, is that BIG should ultimately receive a modern map that visitors can use to navigate the campus. Right now, driving through the complex and finding the correct building can be confusing. Hopefully everyone gets a good night's sleep as we wait to see what tomorrow brings.
2 · Reply
maximaxi41
maximaxi41 Jun. 25 at 12:19 PM
$ITMSF https://ceo.ca/@GlobeNewswire/intermap-expands-role-in-gps-denied-navigation-with
2 · Reply
Latest News on ITMSF
No data available.
Poundsandliberals
Poundsandliberals Jul. 4 at 1:54 PM
$ITMSF Issues of Indonesia sovereignty and information security and the specifications of the project that Intermap meets better than the other bidders combined with Intermap’s previous performance and partnership with an Indonesian company in the first phase of the One Map project all seem to favor the huge non-urban phase being awarded to Intermap, deapite the technological bid scoring. Any other opinions for or against?
0 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jul. 3 at 1:37 PM
$ITMSF No big surprise, moved to July 10th
1 · Reply
Nhearld10
Nhearld10 Jun. 26 at 10:13 PM
$ITMSF pretty sure that’s the only date that matters. Until they move it 3 times.
1 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 26 at 2:59 PM
$ITMSF is anyone seeing trading activity this morning?
2 · Reply
hanman0322
hanman0322 Jun. 26 at 12:40 PM
$ITMSF I think this takes a few more months…
0 · Reply
AaronRho
AaronRho Jun. 26 at 12:34 PM
$ITMSF As I anticipated there is a move of the date of notice intention to award to July 4th. There is a lot going on in the background here when there likely shouldn’t be if it were a normal process without all the data sovereignty issues. Very embarrassing process for BIG in my opinion. Especially if they do all this show just to award it to ITMSF. They should have got it right the first time and failed any company that didn’t meet the requirements of IFSAR sensor and platform to fly it on. ( as stipulated in the RFP) If they did indeed rate a satellite SAR and airborne LiDAR mix so highly, they scored it wrong from the beginning. As a side note for you all copying and pasting AI trash, be wary that those LLMs are sycophants that will soothe your confirmation bias and tell you what you want to hear. It has been so wrong throughout this process but is made to sound confident. It just adds to the noise.
2 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 26 at 4:36 AM
$ITMSF interesting https://disway.id/amp/954151/proyek-geospasial-didominasi-vendor-cina-kpk-watch-minta-big-terbuka-soal-proses-tender/16
3 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 26 at 4:27 AM
$ITMSF https://www.akurat.co/nasional/868698/kpk-watch-soroti-dominasi-vendor-china-di-tender-big-pertanyakan-kedaulatan-data-geospasial-nasional
0 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 25 at 8:59 PM
$ITMSF All eyes will be on tonight to see if any news emerges. One positive outcome, regardless of the procurement process, is that BIG should ultimately receive a modern map that visitors can use to navigate the campus. Right now, driving through the complex and finding the correct building can be confusing. Hopefully everyone gets a good night's sleep as we wait to see what tomorrow brings.
2 · Reply
maximaxi41
maximaxi41 Jun. 25 at 12:19 PM
$ITMSF https://ceo.ca/@GlobeNewswire/intermap-expands-role-in-gps-denied-navigation-with
2 · Reply
MostActive
MostActive Jun. 24 at 4:30 PM
$ITMSF SCL Taktika's role is to act as the loud, aggressive counterweight that ensures the multi-million dollar delays and foreign data processing protocols can no longer stay buried in bureaucratic silence.
1 · Reply
MostActive
MostActive Jun. 24 at 4:28 PM
$ITMSF Are They Reputable? ​It depends on how you define the term: ​As Technical Cartographers? No. They are not independent geospatial experts or mapping scientists. You won't find them publishing peer-reviewed research on Synthetic Aperture Radar. ​As Political Watchdogs? Yes, they have teeth. When they publish an analysis like this, it is usually backed by real, leaked, or closely monitored internal data from within the Indonesian ministries or the House of Representatives (DPR). They know exactly how the Indonesian bureaucracy works, and they know which buttons to push—like data sovereignty and national security—to force a public reckoning or a regulatory audit. ​The Bottom Line ​They aren't writing "clickbait" for casual readers; they are writing targeted critiques designed to pressure state agencies like BIG (the Geospatial Information Agency) and national security bodies like BSSN. ​While Intermap may frame the project's friction as standard "administrative reviews," SCL
0 · Reply
MostActive
MostActive Jun. 24 at 4:26 PM
$ITMSF When you dig into who is actually driving this specific critique, you find that Iqbal Themi and SCL Taktika fall into a very specific category: they aren't casual "flash in the pan" bloggers, but they are heavily political operators who act as strategic, public-facing whistleblowers rather than neutral academic researchers. ​Here is a breakdown of their reputation and how to read their play: ​Who They Are ​SCL Taktika operates as a political and public policy think tank/consultancy based in Indonesia. They specialize in monitoring state-funded infrastructure, national defense procurement, and government transparency. ​Iqbal Themi, as the Executive Director, acts as a prominent public policy observer. He frequently pops up in Indonesian media outlets (and politically leaning talk shows/podcasts like Aktual) to heavily critique state agency oversight, regional elections, and massive procurement contracts. ​Are They Reputable? ​From GEMINI
0 · Reply
Ibid
Ibid Jun. 24 at 1:13 PM
$ITMSF Someone planted these articles. The question is whether they’re providing cover for a Shaanxi award, or setting up a sovereignty challenge that ultimately works against any foreign bidder without embedded Indonesian operations. Both articles are sourced from a single political commentator (Iqbal Themi, SCL Taktika) — alleging Phase 1 IFSAR data was processed in Denver rather than Indonesia, the project was three months late with a Rp 20B penalty, and local content was minimal. He’s calling for Parliament, the State Audit Board, and the National Cyber Agency to investigate. The timing — two business days before the June 26 NOIA — is not coincidental. This is a coordinated political operation designed to influence the award decision. The question is: in whose favor?
3 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 24 at 11:12 AM
$ITMSF https://bekasi.inews.id/amp/698570/data-geospasial-indonesia-diduga-diproses-di-as-pengamat-minta-dpr-dan-bssn-turun-tangan
1 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 24 at 11:11 AM
$ITMSF https://www.jurnas.com/mobile/artikel/1660790/pengamat-data-strategis-indonesia-tak-boleh-lepas-dari-kendali-negara/#google_vignette
0 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 24 at 11:11 AM
$ITMSF is anyone aware of a potential fine that was imposed of just over 1 million usd for delays related to the 2024 project for alleged delays of 3 months?
2 · Reply
prosejr
prosejr Jun. 23 at 1:42 PM
$ITMSF ........i just had opportunity to catch up....including the recent Las Vegas Presentation.........My Takeaways ........ Intermap positioned itself as a sovereign geospatial infrastructure provider, not a project shop 30‑year archive + proprietary radar IP = unique global moat National‑scale 3D mapping capabilities used across defense, aviation, telecom, insurance, and government Revenue model built on multi‑year programs, subscription layers, and high‑margin refresh cycles Multiple references to active procurement, renewals, and expanding mandates Tone was confident and measured — no hype, no stretch claims Intermap trades like a microcap but operates like a Tier‑1 defense/aviation contractor Presentation reinforces the long‑cycle, durable nature of the business BOTTOM line: The story is structurally de‑risked, procurement cycles are active, and the market has not yet priced the shift from “data vendor” to sovereign infrastructure operator.
1 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 23 at 2:15 AM
$ITMSF It appears there is growing support from the World Bank and some individuals within BIG for Intermap on the non-urban project because it offers a proven, lower-risk solution, while other decision-makers within BIG remain interested in the Chinese consortium due to its lower-cost, AI-driven approach. This sets up an intriguing decision between proven execution and technological innovation, and I believe the World Bank representative could ultimately be the key internal influencer given their emphasis on accuracy, transparency, and long-term project success.
3 · Reply
Kevn1111
Kevn1111 Jun. 18 at 4:39 PM
$ITMSF well when all this worry started and it had massive drop I sold half my position at .88 realizing a decent profit but woefully lower than what once was. Very disappointed. That said, today I added half of what I sold back at .675. I may add back to original position or even more if somehow my conviction rises.
2 · Reply
tnfun
tnfun Jun. 18 at 10:48 AM
$ITMSF I still believe they are going to get the entire Indonesian contract. However anyone commenting about Blotts confidence level, he's been doing that for 10 years. He spoke of 8 govt contracts of which the have been signed on to for years and not 1 task order. He keeps spending money to develop products that not one person will ever purchase from them. Even this years AGM doesn't have a location or time because he doesn't want to be held accountable
1 · Reply
aspencolorado
aspencolorado Jun. 18 at 4:12 AM
$ITMSF After listening to the MicroCap session several times, my takeaway is that Intermap is in a very strong position to win all four lots. They are competing in a technical evaluation between two very different approaches: Intermap's proven airborne data collection methodology versus a Chinese firm's proposal to rely heavily on space-based data and AI to fill in gaps. While the newer approach may produce visually appealing results, it does not necessarily provide the same level of accuracy or completeness. I don't believe corruption is involved, but there does appear to be pressure to consider the newer technology and cost savings. Ultimately, decision-makers will likely focus on minimizing risk, even if it means spending more for a proven, reliable solution which Intermap/ExsaMap provides.
0 · Reply