Market Cap N/A
Revenue (ttm) N/A
Net Income (ttm) N/A
EPS (ttm) N/A
PE Ratio N/A
Forward PE N/A
Profit Margin 0.00%
Debt to Equity Ratio N/A
Volume N/A
Avg Vol 10,710
Day's Range N/A - N/A
Shares Out N/A
Stochastic %K 31%
Beta N/A
Analysts N/A
Price Target N/A

Company Profile

CitroTech Inc., a flame retardant and flame suppression company, provides non-toxic and environmentally safe wildfire defense solutions. The company offers wildfire home defense systems, mobile and ground application systems, and products for use in the manufacturing of fire-resilient building products. Its products CitroTech, which is utilized in wildfire defense and to treat lumber to inhibit fire; and coatings to treat lumber. The company was formerly known as General Enterprise Ventures, Inc...

Phone: 800 401 4535
Address:
1740H Del Range Blvd, Suite 166, Cheyenne, United States
topstockalerts
topstockalerts Mar. 20 at 5:26 PM
$CITR very thin, can move on light volume. High risk but that’s where the quick spikes come from.
0 · Reply
ReversalTrack
ReversalTrack Mar. 20 at 4:40 PM
Something is brewing on ticker JAGU 🚨🚀 One of the most explosive signals is setting up on the daily. Uranium+Rare earth play with news . War changes everything especially energy. ⚛️ Uranium = energy independence + national security Don't sleep on ticker JAGU!! $CITR $ILAG $MGN $PRHI good looks.1
0 · Reply
RoyalTitan
RoyalTitan Mar. 20 at 3:20 PM
0 · Reply
Goosey71
Goosey71 Mar. 17 at 5:18 PM
$CITR Bounced with precision off the 50SMA, could be a great place to put your buy orders.
0 · Reply
iAccess_Alpha
iAccess_Alpha Mar. 13 at 10:18 PM
Missed $CITR live? Access the full presentation from iAccess Alpha’s Virtual Best Ideas Spring Conference here: https://www.webcaster5.com/Webcast/Page/3157/53611 #microcap #smallcap #investing
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 3:03 PM
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 3:02 PM
$CITR The comparison gets easier once you look at the chemistry. Traditional fire retardants like Phos-Chek rely on ammonium-phosphate systems, and that is where much of the skepticism around environmental safety comes from. USC-linked testing tied that legacy approach to metals such as lead, arsenic, and cadmium, reinforcing why runoff and ecosystem exposure remain a real concern This product is built on a different foundation: potassium salts derived from food-grade ingredients. That matters because the goal is not just fire resistance, but doing it without the same environmental baggage. In other words, fire protection + biosafety is not a marketing contradiction here. It is the result of a different chemical pathway The certification stack adds more weight: EPA Safer Choice, UL GREENGUARD Gold, and ASTM E84. Together, that points to a mix of fire-performance validation, low chemical emissions, and a cleaner safety profile in real-world use https://www.citrotech.com/
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:53 PM
$CITR The formulation is a major part of the edge here. This is not a legacy fire retardant built around toxic salts or heavy residue. It is described as using natural, food-grade ingredients, with production audited under UL and EPA Safer Choice standards. That matters because the fire-protection mechanism is chemical: it is designed to disrupt the free-radical combustion chain, rather than rely on a harsh physical barrier The compliance angle adds weight. Management says the product is 100% compliant with the Clean Water Act and safe for use around people, animals, and the environment. The ingredient base is also framed as aligned with standards recognized by USDA, EPA, and ECHA The safety testing supports that positioning. The product passed mammalian testing and a 90-day trout study, both cited as confirming safety for fish, humans, and animals
1 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:38 PM
$CITR What happens after rainfall matters just as much as fire performance. The key question is whether runoff creates new risk for soil, groundwater, fish, or food chains. Here the data reads clean After wash-off MFB-31 passed California Aquatic Bioassay Testing and a 90-day trout toxicity study conducted by independent laboratories. The result: non-toxic and safe for fish and aquatic organisms The water-toxicity numbers are also clear. In the California Aquatic CCR Title 22 Fathead Minnow Hazardous Waste Screen Bioassay, LC50 was reported at greater than 750 mg/L. In California, below 500 mg/L is the threshold for hazardous classification. That puts the product above the danger cutoff with room to spare On top of that, it is described as fully biodegradable non-toxic and zero-VOC across its lifecycle. It also aligns with Clean Water Act requirements and California Proposition 65 standards, supporting use around farmland and grazing areas without adding pressure to surrounding ecosystems
1 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:21 PM
$CITR CEO Wes Bolsen publicly confirmed that the product is “safe for pets, safe for children, safe for the environment” https://ir.citrotech.com/citrotech-citr-ceo-on-wildfire-prevention-and-protection/
0 · Reply
Latest News on CITR
General Enterprise Ventures Announces Reverse Stock Split

Aug 27, 2025, 5:40 PM EDT - 7 months ago

General Enterprise Ventures Announces Reverse Stock Split


Equus Announces Second Quarter Net Asset Value

Aug 18, 2025, 8:00 AM EDT - 7 months ago

Equus Announces Second Quarter Net Asset Value

EQS


General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update

Sep 21, 2022, 8:30 AM EDT - 3 years ago

General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update


topstockalerts
topstockalerts Mar. 20 at 5:26 PM
$CITR very thin, can move on light volume. High risk but that’s where the quick spikes come from.
0 · Reply
ReversalTrack
ReversalTrack Mar. 20 at 4:40 PM
Something is brewing on ticker JAGU 🚨🚀 One of the most explosive signals is setting up on the daily. Uranium+Rare earth play with news . War changes everything especially energy. ⚛️ Uranium = energy independence + national security Don't sleep on ticker JAGU!! $CITR $ILAG $MGN $PRHI good looks.1
0 · Reply
RoyalTitan
RoyalTitan Mar. 20 at 3:20 PM
0 · Reply
Goosey71
Goosey71 Mar. 17 at 5:18 PM
$CITR Bounced with precision off the 50SMA, could be a great place to put your buy orders.
0 · Reply
iAccess_Alpha
iAccess_Alpha Mar. 13 at 10:18 PM
Missed $CITR live? Access the full presentation from iAccess Alpha’s Virtual Best Ideas Spring Conference here: https://www.webcaster5.com/Webcast/Page/3157/53611 #microcap #smallcap #investing
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 3:03 PM
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 3:02 PM
$CITR The comparison gets easier once you look at the chemistry. Traditional fire retardants like Phos-Chek rely on ammonium-phosphate systems, and that is where much of the skepticism around environmental safety comes from. USC-linked testing tied that legacy approach to metals such as lead, arsenic, and cadmium, reinforcing why runoff and ecosystem exposure remain a real concern This product is built on a different foundation: potassium salts derived from food-grade ingredients. That matters because the goal is not just fire resistance, but doing it without the same environmental baggage. In other words, fire protection + biosafety is not a marketing contradiction here. It is the result of a different chemical pathway The certification stack adds more weight: EPA Safer Choice, UL GREENGUARD Gold, and ASTM E84. Together, that points to a mix of fire-performance validation, low chemical emissions, and a cleaner safety profile in real-world use https://www.citrotech.com/
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:53 PM
$CITR The formulation is a major part of the edge here. This is not a legacy fire retardant built around toxic salts or heavy residue. It is described as using natural, food-grade ingredients, with production audited under UL and EPA Safer Choice standards. That matters because the fire-protection mechanism is chemical: it is designed to disrupt the free-radical combustion chain, rather than rely on a harsh physical barrier The compliance angle adds weight. Management says the product is 100% compliant with the Clean Water Act and safe for use around people, animals, and the environment. The ingredient base is also framed as aligned with standards recognized by USDA, EPA, and ECHA The safety testing supports that positioning. The product passed mammalian testing and a 90-day trout study, both cited as confirming safety for fish, humans, and animals
1 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:38 PM
$CITR What happens after rainfall matters just as much as fire performance. The key question is whether runoff creates new risk for soil, groundwater, fish, or food chains. Here the data reads clean After wash-off MFB-31 passed California Aquatic Bioassay Testing and a 90-day trout toxicity study conducted by independent laboratories. The result: non-toxic and safe for fish and aquatic organisms The water-toxicity numbers are also clear. In the California Aquatic CCR Title 22 Fathead Minnow Hazardous Waste Screen Bioassay, LC50 was reported at greater than 750 mg/L. In California, below 500 mg/L is the threshold for hazardous classification. That puts the product above the danger cutoff with room to spare On top of that, it is described as fully biodegradable non-toxic and zero-VOC across its lifecycle. It also aligns with Clean Water Act requirements and California Proposition 65 standards, supporting use around farmland and grazing areas without adding pressure to surrounding ecosystems
1 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:21 PM
$CITR CEO Wes Bolsen publicly confirmed that the product is “safe for pets, safe for children, safe for the environment” https://ir.citrotech.com/citrotech-citr-ceo-on-wildfire-prevention-and-protection/
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 13 at 2:21 PM
$CITR IMPACT ON LIVING PLANTS DURING PROLONGED CONTACT This is a technically interesting question. At first glance, it seems contradictory how can a substance polymerize wood fiber and at the same time not harm living plants? When applied to surfaces, MFB-31 by CitroTech forms an ultrathin crystalline coating of potassium salts that protects against ignition, flame spread, and smoke, while not disrupting CO₂ and O₂ gas exchange on the epidermal surfaces of living plant tissue. This is critically important when applied to agricultural and horticultural crops The coating works like a mineral film. It blocks ignition but the leaf pores remain functional. The plant continues to breathe The formulation is not only non-toxic but according to the manufacturer, it also stimulates plant growth while preventing ignition in annual and perennial plants and trees CitroTech’s composition is derived from food-grade, renewable materials and was developed as an alternative to traditional chemical retardants
0 · Reply
WallStreetBuyDip
WallStreetBuyDip Mar. 12 at 11:43 PM
same strategy as always for $CITR - waiting for H% to show low
0 · Reply
Goosey71
Goosey71 Mar. 12 at 10:41 PM
$CITR Has there been any research into impact on foliage if left on for an extended period? And also, what about soil or groundwater impact after it is rained off. Its hard to believe this can polymerise wood fiber just on contact yet not have an impact on live plants?
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 12 at 8:09 PM
$CITR 4 straight days of volume running 3.08x-6.52x above average. over that span price surged +43.9%
0 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 12 at 8:00 PM
$CITR One reason this story stands out is where wildfire ignition starts. In California, roughly 80% of fires are estimated to begin along roadsides, where heat from engines, catalytic converters, brakes, chains, and cigarette butts can ignite dry vegetation. That shifts the opportunity away from aerial firefighting and into ground-based prevention This is where the commercial angle gets larger. The target market is not one niche use case, but thousands of linear miles across highway shoulders, utility corridors, rail lines, and other ignition-prone edges. It has already been used around homeless encampments in San Diego, showing the product can fit municipal deployment The key advantage is regulatory fit. Traditional phosphate retardants face limits near waterways and stormwater runoff zones. An EPA Safer Choice profile matters here because it opens use cases others may struggle to access. That is how a prevention platform starts reaching into a $500M+ global market
1 · Reply
Few_erish
Few_erish Mar. 12 at 7:52 PM
$CITR San Diego has already given this story something early-stage names rarely get: public, field-level validation On January 30, 2025, the city said Fire-Rescue crews were spraying the treatment in high-risk areas, along evacuation routes, and near previously cleared encampments. Fire Marshal Tony Tosca said the program identified 46 acres for treatment, focused on zones 10 feet from roadways in communities with only one evacuation route. The project was backed by a $366,949 grant and tracked with GPS/ArcGIS for monitoring Then the follow-through got more interesting. In the Montezuma/Fairmount evacuation corridor, near Alvarado Estates, Assistant Fire Marshal Alex Kane said documented fires fell from 10 in 2024 to 7 in 2025 over the same January-November period, a 30% reduction. That is not lab theory. That is city-linked field data from an active mitigation zone
0 · Reply
EmmalynnMiller94
EmmalynnMiller94 Mar. 12 at 7:50 PM
$CITR they are chasing the hell out of this
0 · Reply
ElliottBlanchard80
ElliottBlanchard80 Mar. 12 at 7:42 PM
$CITR damn this got real FOMO-y fast
0 · Reply
topstockalerts
topstockalerts Mar. 12 at 7:36 PM
$CITR following closely 💰
0 · Reply
MabelMcMillan95
MabelMcMillan95 Mar. 12 at 7:33 PM
$CITR buyers not letting this breathe
0 · Reply
MargoEverett1995
MargoEverett1995 Mar. 12 at 7:33 PM
$CITR still acting like a leader
0 · Reply
MarthaBishop1979
MarthaBishop1979 Mar. 12 at 7:33 PM
$CITR holy sht this got real loud
0 · Reply