Jan. 27 at 11:56 PM
$BNRG @BrenEnergy @nirbren PART 1:
I’ve reviewed company PRs, investor decks, and public statements against actual SEC filings and dilution events. The pattern is undeniable: upbeat claims around funding, execution, and dilution risk were repeatedly followed by financing rounds that directly contradicted those claims.
Multiple dilution events after implied or stated assurances suggest either gross incompetence or a reckless disregard for shareholder disclosure obligations. Either way, retail investors like myself were financially destroyed relying on statements that did not align with reality.
If material information regarding capital needs, dilution risk, or timelines was omitted or misrepresented at the time those statements were made, that squarely raises Rule 10b-5 and material omission issues. This isn’t “bad luck” — it’s a dangerous pattern that regulators and shareholder attorneys look for.
